THE IMPORTANCE TO ACTIVISTS IN QLD – OF FOI IN UNEARTHING POLICE MISCONDUCT.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: please note , since the writing of this article The Qld Freedom of Information Act and Regulations have been replaced by the Right to information Act and Regulation which can be found at
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Acts_SLs/Acts_SL_R.htm
This article will be amended shortly.
Related articles
Qld Election wish list : Recommendations for statutory reforms relating to the Qld Police , Ethical Standards Command , Crime and Misconduct Commission . www.cynicismcentral.org/node/59
Queensland Taser Rollout- Police Guidelines worth zip in court
http://cynicismcentral.org/node/33
QLD TASER ROLLOUT HALTED - TASER REVIEW LIKELY TO BE A SHAM!
www.cynicismcentral.org/node/65
Qld Cops “Ethical Standards Command” Delays warrants Crime and Misconduct Commission Act Amendment
www.cynicismcentral.org/node/49
Any activist serious about their role in attempting to change the system is bound to come into contact with the cops sometime in their journey. Often this will be a life changing event opening your eyes to the reality of the way cops see themselves and those that dare to question them and their actions.
As a citizen engaged in social and environmental activism since 1997 in Townsville and North Queensland I have had many such encounters.
I have been arrested many times since then, during the protests against the Port Hinchinbrook development to start with , however, most of those took place in the Flinders st Pedestrian mall during the free speech campaign against the Townsville City Council. I have actually been locked up for petitioning, for speaking and for handing out leaflets I have lost count of the times I have been on trial in the Magistrates Court. Some of those I lost but many I have won. Many times the courts have had cause to remind the cops that they had no power to arrest or I had a right to resist.
I have brought 4 civil actions myself in the supreme court and have won 3 of those. I have won appeals in the District court, and have also lost a few. I have won leave to appeal in the court of appeal myself and have knocked off an unconstitutional law that stood for 70 years. I have been to the high court 3 times , losing 1 , winning leave to appeal myself once winning 1, and overturning another in the United Nations Human Rights Committee myself .
I have been in the courts for 10 years of my life and have had cause to attempt to use the mechanisms set up to keep the cops and the system accountable. I began with the naive belief that if you use the processes set up then justice will follow swiftly. The more I attempted it, the more disillusioned and cynical I became.
I had read the fine words of state labor politicians in their speeches to parliament how they rid this state of the police corruption and oppression in 1992, and actually believed for a time that that these people may actually have principles and would uphold them. But again the hypocrisy displayed by the Qld Labor government astounded me.
I have had to dig deep and conduct my own investigations about the interaction between the cops and their superiors, the so called “Ethical Standards Command”, the former Criminal Justice Commission and the Crime and Misconduct Commission and how the state labor government dealt with matters concerning police misconduct.
Freedom of information searches and discovery during civil proceedings turned up thousands of pages of documents, and enough evidence for me to conclude that the state does not treat criminal offences by cops the same way as it does everyday citizens.
To put it simply , if you have been brought to court for resisting arrest , and the court must determine whether it was you or the cops that acted unlawfully , someone will have committed an assault which is said to be a criminal offence under the Criminal Code of Qld . Someone will have also have been guilty of the criminal offence of deprivation of liberty if an arrest is unlawful. The elements of that offence are set out in the code. At common law, in civil proceedings for assault and false imprisonment, the elements are exactly the same as that in the code.
This means that if I have proved my claims in those civil proceedings, I have actually proved criminal conduct on the part of the cops .
What I have found out over the years is that the state and its so called accountability mechanisms are not interested in pursuing cops for assault, deprivation of liberty, perverting the course of justice, fabrication of evidence and perjury . The CMC Act sets out that criminal offences by police are supposed to be regarded as “Misconduct” and “Serious Misconduct”. Complaints against cops are sent back to the cops to investigate themselves , thereby putting the foxes in charge of the henhouse. Though there is a power to audit investigations there appears to be no wish to engage in oversight.
To set the scene I would point out that the system is supposed to think in the following manner:
“Perjury offences are serious offences which strike at the heart of the criminal justice system and are difficult to detect . Considerations of deterrence are important and offenders normally deserve custodial sentences “. (R v Morgan (1995) 82 ACRIMR 518” Extracted from Carters Criminal Law of Qld, 16th Edition , Authors ; MJ Shanahan Qld District Court Judge , P E Smith Barrister Qld ,S Ryan Barrister Qld , Reed International Book Trading as LexisNexis Butterworths Australia, 2007 , Printed Malaysia , p233 par [s124.15].
Some magistrates and judges as well as the cops, the CMC and the Qld government actually know this but know the unearthing of offences by the state STRIKE AT THE HEART OF THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN IT. Some appear to my mind , to see it as their duty , as apposed to treating all equally before the law, to thwart the impact it may have on the public mind. Things would have to change if it were otherwise.
What I will do here to prove what I am saying, is take you direct to the most damning of the documents (Scanned in PDF) , Audio recordings (Copied to MP3) , Court decisions and transcripts. I will provide the sections of the Criminal Code and the CMC Act I am relying on with links to the online legislation as well. As for the interpretation I will quote direct from the latest version of the “Carters Criminal Law of Qld” which is one of the most respected legal publications in Qld. Why I will quote from this is that just about every Solicitor, Barrister, Magistrate and Judge in Qld has one. I will attempt to use the plainest language and avoid legalese.
Whilst I have thousands of pages of documents I will use the example of 4 case studies of 4 sets of events to show you some of the cops “tricks of the trade” and as evidence that there is a problem. The evidence evinces a pattern of behaviour that that clearly may deny justice to a complainant in an action or prosecution against police.
For the benefit of any journalist, if I am looking at the law as it is stated, if I am applying to the facts as they appear then obviously I don’t believe what I am saying to be untrue.
It is no use for anyone to say to me – “If you have evidence of illegality then why don’t you go to the cops, CMC, Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee, or the Minister or Premier?” , obviously I don’t have confidence that it will get anywhere with them . The reason it has taken so long is that I have been caught up in the courts.
The purpose of these case studies is to show you what I have encountered and learnt from, and what people should lookout for and what documents people should search for.
Police Powers and Responsibilities Act and Regulation, Police Service Administration Act and Regulations:
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Acts_SLs/Acts_SL_P.htm
Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 and Regulation 2005
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Acts_SLs/Acts_SL_C.htm
14 Definitions for div 2
In this division—
“conduct” means—
(a) for a person, regardless of whether the person holds an
appointment—conduct, or a conspiracy or attempt to engage in
conduct, of or by the person that adversely affects, or could
adversely affect, directly or indirectly, the honest and impartial
performance of functions or exercise of powers of—
(i) a unit of public administration; or
(ii) any person holding an appointment; or
(b) for a person who holds or held an appointment—conduct, or a
conspiracy or attempt to engage in conduct, of or by the person
that is or involves—
(i) the performance of the person’s functions or the exercise of
the person’s powers, as the holder of the appointment, in a
way that is not honest or is not impartial; or
(ii) a breach of the trust placed in the person as the holder of the
appointment; or
(iii) a misuse of information or material acquired in or in
connection with the performance of the person’s functions
as the holder of the appointment, whether the misuse is for
the person’s benefit or the benefit of someone else.
“hold an appointment” means hold an appointment in a unit of public
administration.
15 Meaning of “official misconduct”
“Official misconduct” is conduct that could, if proved, be—
(a) a criminal offence; or
(b) a disciplinary breach providing reasonable grounds for
terminating the person’s services, if the person is or was the
holder of an appointment.
16 Conduct happening over time, or at any time, may be official
misconduct
(1) Conduct may be official misconduct even though—
(a) it happened before the commencement of this Act; or
(b) some or all of the effects or elements necessary to constitute
official misconduct happened before the commencement of this
Act; or
(c) a person involved in the conduct is no longer the holder of an
appointment.
(2) Conduct engaged in by, or in relation to, a person at a time when the
person is not the holder of an appointment may be official misconduct, if
the person becomes the holder of an appointment.
210 Obstruction or delay of commission procedures
A person who, with intent to obstruct or delay the performance of a
function by the commission or the exercise of a power by a commission
officer—
(a) fabricates any relevant record or thing; or
(b) destroys or alters any relevant record or thing; or
(c) sends any relevant record or thing out of the State;
commits a misdemeanour.
Maximum penalty—255 penalty units or 3 years imprisonment.
Carters Criminal Law of Qld 16th Ed on Perverting the course of justice and fabricating evidence.
Page 231, Par [123.30].....The prosecution merely has to show that in the judicial proceeding in which the accused was a witness he or she wilfully (deliberately and not inadvertently or by mistake) made on oath a statement which he or she knew to be false or did not believe to be true .....R v Milward [1985] 1 QB 519; 1985 1 All ER 859 ; (1985) 80 Cr App R 280....
Page 235 Par [s126.20] Meaning of section The word “fabricates” is not necessarily used in the pejorative sense. The word may only mean “make up” or “get together” without any dishonest connotation. See R v Love (1983) 9 ACRIMR 1. The offence is complete even though the tribunal never sits; R v Vreones [1891] 1 QB 360 .
Page 241, Par [s132.25] ....The course of justice is perverted or obstructed by impairing the capacity of a court to do justice. An act which has the tendency to effect this impairment is the actus reus of attempting to pervert the course of justice......
Par [s132.30].... “It is well established at common law and under cognate statutory provisions that the offence of attempting or conspiring to pervert the course of justice can be committed when there are no curial proceedings on foot, see R v Murphy (1985) 158 CLR 596; 61 ALR 139; 59ALJR 682 ; 16 ACRIMR 2003 . It is enough that an act has a tendency to frustrate or deflect a prosecution which the accused contemplates may possibly be instituted even though the possibility has not been considered by police. See R v Rogerson (1992) 174 CLR 268 ; 107 ALR 225 ; 66 ALJR 500 , 60 ACRIMR 429 .......An act which has a tendency to deflect the police from prosecuting a criminal offence or instituting disciplinary proceedings before a judicial tribunal , or from adducing evidence of the true facts , is an act tending to pervert the course of justice , and if done with the intent to achieve that result , constitutes an attempt to pervert the course of justice ......
Page 247 , Par [s140.20] ......... “To prove this charge there has to be evidence that the accused has done enough for there to be a risk without further action by him that an injustice would occur, see R v Murray [1982] WLR 475 ; [1982] All ER 225; (1982) 75 Cr App R 58 .....It is sufficient if the evidence discloses a risk or possibility that injustice might result. See Foord v Whiddett (1985) 60 ALR 269; 16 ACRIMR 464.
Criminal Code Act 1899 Qld
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Acts_SLs/Acts_SL_C.htm
10 Accessories after the fact
A person who receives or assists another who is, to the person’s
knowledge, guilty of an offence, in order to enable the person to escape
punishment, is said to become an accessory after the fact to the offence.
92 Abuse of office
(1) Any person who, being employed in the public service, does or
directs to be done, in abuse of the authority of the person’s office, any
arbitrary act prejudicial to the rights of another is guilty of a
misdemeanour, and is liable to imprisonment for 2 years.
(2) If the act is done or directed to be done for purposes of gain, the
person is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.
123 Perjury
(1) Any person who in any judicial proceeding, or for the purpose of
instituting any judicial proceeding, knowingly gives false testimony
touching any matter which is material to any question then depending in
that proceeding, or intended to be raised in that proceeding, is guilty of a
crime, which is called “perjury”.
(2) It is immaterial whether the testimony is given on oath or under any
other sanction authorised by law.
(3) The forms and ceremonies used in administering the oath or in
otherwise binding the person giving the testimony to speak the truth are
immaterial, if the person assents to the forms and ceremonies actually used.
(4) It is immaterial whether the false testimony is given orally or in
writing.
(5) It is immaterial whether the court or tribunal is properly constituted,
or is held in the proper place, or not, if it actually acts as a court or tribunal
in the proceeding in which the testimony is given.
(6) It is immaterial whether the person who gives the testimony is a
competent witness or not, or whether the testimony is admissible in the
proceeding or not.
(7) The offender cannot be arrested without warrant.
123A Perjury—contradictory statements
If, on the trial of a person for perjury, the jury is satisfied that—
(a) the accused has made 2 statements on oath or under another
sanction authorised by law, 1 of which is irreconcilably in
conflict with the other; and
(b) the accused made 1 of the statements knowing it to be false; but the jury is unable to say which statement was falsely made, the jury may make a special finding to that effect and find the accused guilty of perjury.
124 Punishment of perjury
(1) Any person who commits perjury is liable to imprisonment for
14 years.
(2) If the offender commits the crime in order to procure the conviction
of another person for a crime punishable with imprisonment for life, the
offender is liable to imprisonment for life.
125 Evidence on charge of perjury
A person cannot be convicted of committing perjury or of counselling or
procuring the commission of perjury upon the uncorroborated testimony
of 1 witness.
126 Fabricating evidence
(1) Any person who, with intent to mislead any tribunal in any judicial
proceeding—
(a) fabricates evidence by any means other than perjury or
counselling or procuring the commission of perjury; or
(b) knowingly makes use of such fabricated evidence;
is guilty of a crime, and is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.
(2) The offender cannot be arrested without warrant.
129 Destroying evidence
Any person who, knowing that any book, document, or other thing of
any kind, is or may be required in evidence in a judicial proceeding,
wilfully destroys it or renders it illegible or undecipherable or incapable of
identification, with intent thereby to prevent it from being used in evidence,
is guilty of a misdemeanour, and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years.
140 Attempting to pervert justice
A person who attempts to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course
of justice is guilty of a crime.
Maximum penalty—7 years imprisonment.
245 Definition of “assault”
(1) A person who strikes, touches, or moves, or otherwise applies force
of any kind to, the person of another, either directly or indirectly, without
the other person’s consent, or with the other person’s consent if the consent
is obtained by fraud, or who by any bodily act or gesture attempts or
threatens to apply force of any kind to the person of another without the
other person’s consent, under such circumstances that the person making
the attempt or threat has actually or apparently a present ability to effect the
person’s purpose, is said to assault that other person, and the act is called
an “assault”.
(2) In this section—
“applies force” includes the case of applying heat, light, electrical force,
gas, odour, or any other substance or thing whatever if applied in such
a degree as to cause injury or personal discomfort.
246 Assaults unlawful
(1) An assault is unlawful and constitutes an offence unless it is
authorised or justified or excused by law.
(2) The application of force by one person to the person of another may
be unlawful, although it is done with the consent of that other person.
283 Excessive force
In any case in which the use of force by one person to another is lawful
the use of more force than is justified by law under the circumstances is
unlawful.
CASE STUDY 1. THE CONDUCT OF POLICE AND THE FORMER CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION IN RELATION TO THE ASSAULTS ON PROTESTERS ON OYSTER POINT , CARDWELL 14/91997.
The environmental dispute at Cardwell North Qld was a classic example of what is described as an “environmental conflict”. Residents of the Town and region were so split by the claims of economic benefits and whipped up by pro development media and the promises of developer Keith Williams and right wing politicians – they turned on opponents.
Threats of violence and actual violence occurred. It is clear development supporters felt at liberty to engage in this activity but that it could have been brought under control.
On September 14 1997 a protest took place where conservationists, environmentalists and other concerned citizens walked along the marine park foreshore which was public land, and were set upon by development employees and development supporters. Protesters were punched and kicked including women, people had their faces pushed into the mud, mud pushed down their throats, were grabbed by the throat in full view of the police.
Complaints were later made to the then Criminal Justice Commission of Qld police inaction where they were clearly seen to have witnessed such assaults on people who were lawfully and peacefully exercising their right to free speech.
The CJC interviewed people who made such complaints, the police involved, and some development staff. The process was a recorded interview, from which a summary and memorandum was made drawing conclusions. I have here the reply I personally got from the CJC dated 22/12/97 from Mr MA Barnes Chief officer of the Complaints Section Misconduct Division, and the Memorandum or synopsis/summary of the interviews was done by Det INS M Palmer 5/12/ 97. (FOI copy)
(link http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/cjchinchinbrookincident.pdf.pdf ).
I ask that both be read carefully, the CJC deleted names of other complainants from the copy given to me. To my knowledge the police video has never been released.
Given the downgrading by police of what they themselves witnessed to pushing and shoving , the statements that no one witnessed the assault of David Haigh , the photo on the front page of the Townsville Bulletin showing one such assault, with police clearly seen by the palm trees in the background looking on that the truth was not told . Given the expression of the law from the Carters above, and it was the same then, the statutory provisions relating to obstructing investigations , it should have raised eyebrows in the CJC that they were not getting the full story from police .
If there is a difference between the interviews, the summary, and the findings that shows that the truth was not told, and had it been, proceedings MIGHT HAVE RESULTED, then prima facie someone has “deflected” or “obstructed” that result.
Ask yourselves this, if there were multiple police giving evidence against a person they have arrested of punching and kicking, and there were no independent witnesses, would a court have accepted that evidence?
Ask yourselves also about what impact it would have had , given the doctrine that ignorance of the law is no excuse that the CJC KNEW that the protesters were all UNLAWFULLY assaulted -on public confidence in the police .
CASE STUDY 2, CJC AND CMC COMPLAINTS AGAINST BRADLEY MICHEAL GREENLAND 7157 QLD POLICE AND THE ACTIONS OF SENIOR POLICE .
Link to online copies of the documents:
http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/greenland-cjc-esc-cmc.pdf.pdf
This case study concerns the investigations of 3 arrests of myself by the then Const Bradley Michael Greenland 7157 Qld that took place on the 12/11/98, 8/12 /98 and 22/1/99 in the Flinders Pedestrian Mall. In each of the first 2 cases I was peacefully petitioning against the Nelly Bay development and letters to the Townsville City Council to recognise Free Speech, and on the 3rd I stood outside the Flinders Mall Police Beat with a red flag and a placard on my front and back with the words “YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH IN THIS TOWN, AND THEN THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT”. I successfully got the second matter dropped and won the 3rd in the magistrates court. The first one I lost on hearsay evidence and appealed to the district court but lost before Judge Clive Wall on hearsay evidence.
Complaints were made to the then CJC about the matters soon after they occurred. The CJC referred them back to police. Officers of the CJC were highly critical of the QPS in the way they “investigated” the complaints and made some recommendations about “Managerial guidance” of Greenland and watch house staff . Whilst the CJC thought it unreasonable that my petitions were not returned to me, their only concern was whether procedural requirements for arrest had been complied with, not whether a person has a right not to be arrested. Both the CJC and the QPS wanted me to informally resolve my complaints, which I refused to do as they were still trying to convict me at the time.
In my complaints I had said in part that Greenland had told me I was barred from the mall, I had also gave evidence that in relation to the 1st (Former, belly laugh) Mayor Mooney came through the mall ,and I had asked him if he wanted to sign my petition against the Nelly Bay development, that I was arrested soon after in a great hurry by Greenland. The documents appear to show that the police were taking orders from Mooney. That I was variously a “well known political activist” and a “known political radical”. It became clear also that the fact I had previously has cause to complain about police was an issue.
Greenland was interviewed about the complaints Det Sgt Kirkpatrick of the Innisfail CIB and a tape was made of that interview. A synopsis was done of that interview in which Greenland is heard to say words to the effect I was a trouble maker during the (1998) wharf confrontation, that I “was a nothing – a nobody, not even a street offender”, further that I was neither a threat to him nor anybody else.
(Link the recording is of very poor quality:
http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/greenlandkirkpatrick.mp3.mp3).
Greenland said that he knew I had previously complained about police conduct in Cardwell.
None of that appears in the synopsis. However, the good detective stated that a simple peek at Greenlands note book would evince the truth. Alas it does not. A peek shows a false version of events, a fabrication of a statement , this was repeated in an unsworn statement . A look at the unsworn statements shows a bit of confusion on the part of the civilian witness of who she actually was at best and who actually wrote it at worst.
FOI did not turn up any record of any interview or synopsis or reference to any of the Cop Donaldson.
During the 3rd arrest bystanders attempted to intervene but were prevented from giving their names or appearing as independent witnesses .
The watch house records show that the pen was ripped from my hands as I was trying to write that I was not allowed to record injuries , and in the health comments it is stated that I refused to sign.
Greenland attempted in the second civil proceeding against him to maintain his made up reason for arrest. His note book entry was admitted into evidence and he attempted to make use of the fabrications contained in it and where he wrote it .
(see par [75] of the judgement: http://cynicismcentral.org/node/29).
I did make a complaint to the CMC about his conduct during the civil trial that he committed perjury, perverted the course of justice and fabricated evidence. However, the CMC said that “Due to the age of the conduct and the nature of the critical comments” of the judge they would not do it. The Palm Island stuff was also happening at that time, and the QPS, CMC and the government were under a lot of pressure. I had told them I would not allow it to be referred back to the police and they knew I had copies of the FOI documents about the previous complaints. (Although it took anther attempt to get the tape of Greenland and Kirkpatrick.)
All they had to do was get a copy of the transcripts.
It is clear the QPS attempted to obstruct a just outcome of the matter
To summarise :
• Greenland made up grounds of arrest , a proper investigation and cross examination by investigating officers should have determined that- that constitutes perverting the course of justice and or fabrication of evidence;
• Greenland fabricated entries in his police notebook and should be taken to have known this may have been used in evidence. This should have been obvious, as above for perverting and fabrication
• Greenland intentionally deprived independent witnesses from assisting, as above for perverting or obstructing justice.
• An unlawful arrest is an assault, and this is a crime.
• The ESC clearly did not give all of its documents to the then CJC and clearly obstructed them, this unjustly dragged the matters out.
All this constitutes serious misconduct, and it was seriously possible this could have been determined from the outset. But this goes further. The documents provided show that the police minister and premier became involved when I tested the waters with an application for an ex gratia payment for the unlawful 8/12/98 arrest. When this failed and I brought the 3 actions against the state also, a chance presented itself with government having all the info that they could have done the right thing and charge him, and in so doing change the culture of the QPS .
CASE STUDY 3; THE CMC/ ESC/ QPS INVESTIGATION OF A COMPLAINT OF EXCESSIVE FORCE BY TOWNSVILLE POLICE WATCH HOUSE STAFF ON 26/1/2002 BY THE (THE THEN) OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE TOWNSVILLE POLICE STATION SNR SGT DALE LAST (NOW ON THE TOWNSVILLE CITY COUNCIL).
On the 26th of January 2002 I was arrested after burning the Australian Flag at Townsville’s Australia Day ceremony, in protest against the Howard government’s refugee policy of locking innocent people up in the desert until they go mad. And I maintain still that that arrest was unlawful- I was denied independent witnesses, and though the prosecutor admitted he had not made out their case -was found guilty anyway. I strongly resisted that arrest.
However, once in the Townsville watch house the police refused to remove the cuffs for hours, I could not sit because of the position of my arms and the tightness of the cuffs and nearly passed out. I had to pace the cell to keep awake. I ended up with my feet splayed leaning against the glass wall of the cell to remain upright, until finally the pain overcame me and I vomited. It was after seeing that that the cuffs were removed by cops.
I was during this time not allowed to make a call in case bail would be denied and let someone know what happened in case it got worse.
I was told I would be bailed .They refused/ignored medication for the pain. I was released late that night
I was angry as hell at my treatment and made it clear that I wanted the cuffs off. It felt like my arms were broken. I kicked the holding cell door and swore at them.
A complaint was lodged with the CMC who referred it back to the QPS through the ESC to investigate.
(link: http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/lastwatchhouseesccmc.pdf.pdf )
Myself and all officers bar one (whom I could not indentify were interviewed).
I made it clear from the outset that I would seek compensation but this complaint was about what occurred at the watch house and who I made the complaint against. It was made clear from the outset by the CMC that if my allegations were proved it would be misconduct. So too the ESC. It was an investigation into possible criminal offences by police. And would have led to civil action by myself as well. It was known that court proceedings WOULD FOLLOW.
I made clear during my interview with Snr Sgt Last (Townsville City Councillor ) the consequences if such a culture were allowed to continue.
Last obtained the watch house records including the video, he taped the interviews with all officers and myself. He did a synopsis of the interviews and made transcripts of myself and only 3 officers.
On June 24 2002 an Assistant Commissioner Williams wrote to me that based on denials by the Watch house Sergeant, independent medical or other evidence from me the matter was determined to be unsubstantiated and finalised.
I still was being placed on trial and had to deal with that and other issues on foot which are obvious from the other cases on my website as well as university. However I conducted an FOI search of the documents relating to this matter and it took a long time. It took 2 goes to get one of the officers interview tapes.
It became clear, again, that the synopsis did not match what occurred in the interviews .It is said there was no evidence that I vomited (this frightening police into taking to cuffs of and to the civil standard -evidence of knowledge of the interference with the rights of a person). One cop even going so far as to say I was banging my head against the wall.
The FOI documents turned up evidence that the watch house video tape was placed back in the watch house on the 3rd of April 2002 to be taped over . A month before the decision “finalising it”.
As the synopsis went up the chain it was clear that they regarded lack of evidence that I had vomited as the key upon which the complaint would be dealt with.
I had all the tapes through FOI, it became clear that the investigation was neither audited by the ESC nor the CMC and no transcripts of interviews with other officers nor the tapes were called in.
One tape turned up a version that corroborated mine. A tape of a police officer in the watch house at the time who witnessed what I said happened about vomiting, and then being released from the cuffs ,and being bailed -Interview of Const Mundt .
(Link to very poor quality recording:
http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/mundtlast.mp3.mp3 ) .
His version of events was contrary to that of all other officers. And it was clear that if that had been made known ,then what was stated by the others would be untrue. And proceedings would follow. More than that it would have shown both the ESC and the CMC that they could have no confidence in those officers.
The interview tapes and transcripts also provided a differing account to that given on oath at the trial for the flag burning (which at the time was working its way up the courts, and I have the transcripts so don’t try me !).
• It is clear that at the time of writing his synopsis, Dale Last (now on the Townsville City Council) knew proceedings were in the offing and that he deflected an outcome that would have led to those proceedings.
• It is also clear he knew it at the time that he placed the video back in the watch house.
• It is clear he knew at the time he was reporting to an entity that reports to the CMC.
• He has to be taken to have known at the time of being informed of the outcome of the complaint that if he stayed quiet it would result in an unjust result.
• He must be taken to have known that he was covering for police who lied to him, the ESC and the CMC.
• The police at the watch house who lied must be taken to have known that that constitutes an offence.
• It is clear through the previous 2 case studies that it must be known that neither transcripts nor tapes will be called for before finalising complaints, and this evidences a systemic or wide spread problem.
• It is clear from these 3 cases that it constitutes a culture of cover up and “solidarity” with other police.
• It is clear evidence was destroyed , it is clear the investigation was obstructed , deflected , that justice was perverted and led to the unjust result that a judicial proceeding in either the criminal or civil jurisdiction was defeated.
Before leading into the next case study , I find it necessary to explain some elements of police culture by referring to the literature . The terms I will refer to are “Contempt of a cop” , “Solidarity” and “backstage Punishment” .
Sometimes people could find it hard to fathom why a person could face violence on the part of police, they may think that a person deserved it or was probably doing something wrong.
However, An activist is likely to come into contact with the cops many times in their journey and see things that are quite unnerving and deserving of investigation . It is the case in many instances where protest is resorted to that it is against government . And these government are attempting to assert their authority in the face of a loss of legitimacy or public confidence . Police who are ordered to uphold this authority in many cases may feel they have a free hand , and I think I have in the most part proved this point but will go further in the next case. It can be seen though, that where police target people for no other reason than that of offending the legitimacy of the state or the political situation , it is then clear they are acting to uphold the social order and not public order.
I find a book called “Violence and Police Culture” Tony Coady et al , Melbourne University Press 2000 very enlightening . In Particular but not limited to ch 4 by Janet Chan “ Backstage Punishment”. And refer the reader to some extracts from it based on studies of police behaviour over many years :
“Punishment by the police is almost Durkheimian in quality: it is propelled by moral sentiments , it forms and symbolises moral judgements , and its effects are primarily to reaffirm the moral order. The morality of this moral order is widely believed and strongly defended. For example , the personal authority of an officer .....is vested with a quality of sacredness . The sacredness of police authority is partly related to the officers ‘sense of mission’ and ‘their sense of themselves as the thin blue line’, performing an essential role in safeguarding the social order , which would lead to disastrous consequences if their authority is threatened. Those who defy or challenge police authority are punished for failing the attitude test and committing the worst crime of all – ‘contempt of cop’. In a Durkheimian sense , the use of violence against the offender strengthens the solidarity of the officers and reinforces the conscience collective of this occupational group” (at p94)
And : “ Supervision of police work is often based on a high degree of mutual dependence and reciprocity between officers and their sergeants, where sergeants depended on officers to do their work while officers depended on sergeants to cover their mistakes. Since officers mostly work out of their supervisor’s sight , there is an emphasis on results , for example arrests and charges. The lack of meaningful supervision , together with wide discretionary powers and the pressure for productivity , all contribute to the development and reinforcement of cynicism , secrecy , solidarity , and incentives to secure arrests.......” (at p 100) .
It is also helpful to refer the reader to the 1997 CJC Report “Reducing Police Civilian Conflict” at p 44-47 link: www.cynicismcentral.org/node/26 .
Thus, the scene is set for case study 4.
CASE STUDY 4 : UNLAWFUL ARREST AT THE PARLIAMENT OF QLD , AT TOWNSVILLE 3/9/02 (NATIONAL FLAG DAY) , ALLEGATIONS OF POLICE “INTELLIGENCE” ABOUT MYSELF PLANNING A DISRUPTION INSIDE THE HISTORIC PARLIAMENT.
I will be sparse with the full factual detail as it is adequately set out in the documents and audio I have posted on my site at : http://cynicismcentral.org/node/25
I went to watch the parliament as a political science student , and was denied entry on the basis that I “was a potential breach of the peace” . I challenged police and ended up engaged in an argument with Snr Sgt
Dale Last (now a councillor on the Townsville City Council ) and a senior officer named Stolz. The terms of that argument are set out in my statement of claim and can be listened to on the audio mp3.
Link: http://cynicismcentral.org/node/25
Last can be heard to say in part : “...you know what you’ve done............you’ve had your day in court and that’s why your dirty.............. based on your previous behaviour we have denied you entry”.
When one looks to the documentary evidence of police consistently referring to complaints against police , Lasts own actions in the previous case study and this one , it appears he was trying to demonstrate his solidarity and reinforce the “moral or social order” and the “sacredness of police authority” .
After the confrontation with him -it was then left for me to exercise my right of entry and for the minions to do the dirty work. I got arrested, unceremoniously dumped in a caged van and put on trial. I won the trial.
However during the trial the officers stated that they- the cops - had” intelligence” I would disrupt the parliament. None of the senior officers they referred to as having told them that had enough guts to give evidence and go under oath. They left the minions to carry the can.
To say this somewhat aroused my curiosity would be an understatement of the greatest magnitude. Determined that nothing should stand in the way of a clean hit in the coming civil trial I FOI’d “police intelligence and turned up some censored documents . I appealed to the FOI Commissioner and found more . However certain sections and words were blanked out . I found most of those during discovery for the trial.
A selection of those are linked here:
http://cynicismcentral.nigelsim.org/policeintelligenceoxymoron.pdf
It turns out that my complaints about what occurred in the first case study featured heavily on their minds. Together with the nature of the security threat, civil disobedience. False info also appeared that I had been a member of the Jabiluka Action group. I had organised an anti uranium protest against John Howard in 98 that took the cops by complete surprise . I got to within an inch of little Johnnies face to let him know I thought he was a fascist and got arrested “waving his car goodbye” with a placard . I was never a member of the named group.
They also said I was believed to have been a former member of the MUA because I backed them at the Townsville picket lines. Not so.
One document said that due to turning up to a community cabinet in 98 or 99 and talking to all the ministers and later talking to Beattie about the first case study , that I might travel all the way to Charters Towers to “disrupt” that one .
One of the things the “Security Intelligence Branch QPS” and the FOI Commissioner thought too sensitive was the following “Coleman is well known to Townsville Police for acts of civil disobedience and for having A CALOUS DISREGARD FOR LAWFULL AUTHORITY” .
They talk of trespass and stealing, those were overturned. They related to the Hinchinbrook campaign. We were accused by Keith Williams of cutting down the mangroves in front of his development when it was his people or his supporters. So we cut down Bamboo Poles near the railway to make and put up tripods there to catch him or his mates at it while we took photos . Needless to say we ended up being charged.
And despite a clear statement that I had not resorted to violent force in self defence (which the courts have said is a right) before the end of 99 , not only were my details referred to ASIO in December 99 , but “Military Intelligence” . Yes I was a former soldier but military intelligence seems a bit steep . Maybe it had something to do with this heinous crime - http://cynicismcentral.org/node/19 . I have blanked out the name of the ASIO officer to avoid prosecution for such disclosure . The initials are mine.
But they also blanked out what type of file it was “Protective security risk”. This would have also gone out to the protective security services guarding the courts and judges , so maybe the intent was to taint their views before a case.
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE CASE STUDIES BASED ON DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, COURT FINDINGS AND POLICE CONDUCT:
That FOI must be considered as an important part of any activists arsenal during any campaign. You are bound to come into contact with the cops and maybe multiple times. The more the interactions the more chance they will keep a file on you and draft a profile. If you have complained about their conduct you can expect special treatment if you continue your challenge .
If you believe your rights have been unlawfully interfered with , you cant rely on the CMC or ESC to pounce on police misconduct , you have to investigate the matter your selves.
Senior police will cover for the “Service” to uphold its moral authority. So too the ESC and CMC and any government of whatever creed as they need them to do their bidding.
If you have cause to sue them you will be treated differently than any other citizen because you exercise your rights, not once but often and it is the duty of an activist to attract attention to any given cause or situation that needs attention.
So far my opinion is despite the evidence the courts are not willing to use “exemplary damages” to punish either the cops or the state and teach them that the culture must change . This is the purpose of such civil remedies. The documents you find may assist you also to add malicious prosecution to your action though the courts could use this to minimise you win by awarding costs for proof if they are agin you .
That the process of getting a remedy for infringements of ones rights and obtaining the info to do so is frustratingly slow , and by the time you get it, the CMC may tell you to bugger off.
So , that being so , I publish this in the hope that others can learn from these case studies and know what to look for and how to find it . Whether or not anything happens here is not the point, there will be others and a case for change can be built upon comparison and research. Its time for citizens to do the states job again .
In Qld , if it is YOU who has had the encounter then what relates to it concerns your personal affairs. As such they are matters which fall under the FOI regulation “Personal affairs”
Freedom of Information Act 1992 Qld and Regulation
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Acts_SLs/Acts_SL_F.htm
Below is a starter checklist of what to look for if you have had a bad encounter with the cops to the ministers office in writing with proof of your signature :
To establish date time and place :
• CAD reports , computer dispatch reports naming the vehicles and officers involved ;
• Any audio recording by the officers concerned or video
• Any police note book entries concerning the incident
• Any police communications recordings relating to the incident
• Any media taken by the police as evidence
• “Crisp” or crime reports or indexes
• The procedures established for police conduct on the day if it was a planned event
IF you have been arrested :
• Watch house custody and inspection records
• Watch house video
• Any recordings made by officers including notebooks
• All bail records
• Brief of evidence together with prosecutors check list
If you make a complaint, wait for the interviews and the decision , and get an adjournment till you get the outcome . You may get the complaint audited before your hearing or afterwards but you will have evidence you can compare. Then FOI the cops, ESC, CMC and the ministers office for all info regarding that complaint including:
• All recordings of all witnesses
• All transcripts of those recordings
• Any synopsis’s of those interviews
• All correspondence by police and ESC regarding the complaints
• All correspondence and internal CMC documents relating to investigating that complaint and any ministerial documents relating to it
• After any audit , FOI the CMC and ESC and Cops and ministers office for info regarding that .
If you have won your trial or have the matter dropped you will be entitled to sue:
• Get certificates of dismissal pursuant to s149 of the Justices Act 1886 and s700 of the criminal code to make sure they (The judges) have no leg to stand on . Compare the Power suit with that of Watson .
• If the charge is dropped or you have won you will be entitled to discovery of more documents you don’t have. And you will find they all lied and held back despite it being a crime under the FOI Act .
• After you have won pursue them for lying and FOI everybody’s responses to your new complaint and see how stupid you can make them look in the end .
Yours
Pat Coleman
,
.
Comments
Mulrunji Investigation Report out
That would be the 3rd .........
_________________________________________________
Five years on, Doomadgee death investigators facing discipline
Michael McKenna and Tony Koch From: The Australian November 19, 2009 12:00AM
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/five-years-on-doomadgee-deat...
SENIOR officers who investigated the 2004 death in custody of Palm Island man Mulrunji Doomadgee are expected to face disciplinary action following a damning Crime and Misconduct Commission report that accuses Queensland police of "protecting their own".
On the fifth anniversary of Doomadgee's watchhouse death, which sparked riots in the Aboriginal community off Townsville, the yet-to-be finalised CMC report has condemned police handling of the initial investigation and rejected the findings of an internal police review into their handling of the case.
The long-overdue report was ordered in 2006 after Deputy State Coroner Christine Clements slammed the death-in-custody investigation as lacking "transparency, objectivity and independence".
Police handed a 266-page report to the CMC last year recommending only "managerial guidance" of the four police investigators - two of whom were friends of Palm Island senior sergeant Chris Hurley, who was charged and acquitted in 2007 of Doomadgee's manslaughter.
In an explosive revelation, Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Commissioner Alan MacSporran confirmed yesterday he had accepted a brief to represent the Queensland Police Service at the second coronial inquest into Doomadgee's death, to be held in February.
Mr MacSporran will appear for the QPS at tomorrow's inquest directions hearings in Townsville.
Neither he nor the parliamentary crime and misconduct committee have initiated any action in response to the repeated public complaints about delays in investigating Doomadgee's death.
Mr MacSporran yesterday denied any conflict of interest in representing the QPS. "I have not been asked to investigate any matters in respect of this issue, so I have no conflict," he said.
Indigenous leaders and lawyers have accused the CMC and police of double standards over the five-year wait, with rioters jailed within months of the violence, and officers who stared down the mob given bravery awards last year.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service chief executive Shane Duffy said Queensland's indigenous community had waited too long for the investigation to be finalised. "Why the delay if there is nothing to hide and nothing to fear?" Mr Duffy asked.
During the first inquest, Ms Clements was told the Townsville Regional Crime Co-ordinator Warren Webber had appointed two of Sergeant Hurley's friends - Palm Island detective Darren Robinson and Townsville-based detective Raymond Kitching - to investigate Doomadgee's death.
The detectives were picked up at the Palm Island airport by Sergeant Hurley, and then shared a meal and beers with the officer at his home on the night of Doomadgee's death, on November 19.
The inquest was told that the officers had failed to secure the scene where the injury that claimed Doomadgee's life occurred, and that the officers were involved in off-the-record discussions with Sergeant Hurley during their six-day investigation.
Another internal investigation into the case - specifically dealing with the $102,955 ex-gratia payment Sergeant Hurley received for property lost in the riots that followed Doomadgee's death, and an insurance claim he lodged for property valued at a third of that amount - is ongoing.
______________________________________
Silence and delay over cell death shame far north
COMMENT: Tony Koch
From: The Australian November 19, 2009 12:00AM
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/silence-and-delay-over-cell...
ANYONE who doubts that two- speed justice exists in Queensland need only consider the much delayed Crime and Misconduct Commission investigation into the death in custody of Palm Island man Mulrunji Doomadgee.
On October 30, 2006, former Beattie government minister Merri Rose met her former press secretary in the Brisbane City mall and asked him to deliver a threat to premier Peter Beattie that certain allegedly embarrassing information would be made public if she was not given a plum job.
The message was relayed, the Crime and Misconduct Commission chairman, Bob Needham, was informed the same day and an investigation began. On November 9, 2006, Rose was charged with extortion -- to which she pleaded guilty and was jailed.
So it took the CMC -- the state's anti-corruption watchdog organisation -- 10 days to receive the complaint, complete the investigation and lay charges.
Compare that response with the case of Doomadgee, who was arrested on Palm Island on November 19, 2004, for disorderly conduct. He had sworn at a police liaison officer in a back street. Less than an hour later, he was dead in a cell, having sustained horrific injuries including four broken ribs and with his liver cleaved in two.
The appallingly inadequate investigation by police into the death in custody spoke volumes about the Queensland Police Service's lack of professionalism. It was so demonstrably woeful that the CMC undertook an inquiry into the investigation. But five years have elapsed since the death of the Aboriginal man and that inquiry has not been finalised.
The revelation that the parliamentary officer with the statutory responsibility to oversee CMC investigations and refer any official complaints he receives to that committee is to leave his position and act for the Queensland Police Service at the second inquest into Mulrunji's death is another incredible event in this sad saga.
Alan MacSporran SC yesterday said he had not received any formal complaint about the time taken for the CMC investigation so had not seen any need to take any action.
They are weasel words as there has been trenchant criticism in all media, but particularly The Australian, for more than two years about the delays.
The failure to gain closure on Doomadgee's death is attributable to the complete absence of political leadership -- particularly that of former police minister (and former Aboriginal affairs minister) Judy Spence, who had ministerial responsibility for most of the period since the death.
She applauded the quick justice meted out to the Palm Islanders who rioted a week after Doomadgee's death and burned police buildings. But she went missing when it came to standing up for Aboriginal people when it was clear to all that police had acted inappropriately time and again.
The long-awaited CMC investigation has open to it only two possible findings with regard to the police investigation into the violent death in custody of Doomadgee.
They are that the police were involved in a shameless cover-up, or that these senior officers were grossly inefficient.
Your call, Mr Needham.
Proserpine Cop Trial
Video sends Benjamin Thomas Price to trial over assaults
By Peter Michael
Courier Mail
July 04, 2009 12:00am
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25729895-3102,00.html
.GRAPHIC footage shows a former Airlie Beach cop accused of police brutality swing a petite female tourist about by the hair, slam her into the ground and knee her in a spine lock.
Former senior constable Benjamin Thomas Price, 32, yesterday pleaded not guilty to six counts of assault on three tourists in Proserpine Magistrates Court.
After a four-day committal hearing, including detailed video footage of two alleged attacks and eyewitness accounts, magistrate Athol Kennedy ordered Price to stand trial.
Renee Toms, 22, a Sydney bartender who weighs 47kg yesterday gave evidence about her alleged attack inside Airlie Beach police station in May last year.
Fellow victims Timothy Steele and Nicholas Le Fevre, in earlier testimony, told how they had allegedly been punched and bashed in separate incidents by Price.
Steele had allegedly been bashed beyond recognition and a fire-hose jammed in his mouth.
Price resigned from the police force under an internal affairs investigation last year and four other former Airlie Beach officers have since left the force after the probe into police brutality.
Shocking video footage shows Price bending the handcuffed woman over the charge counter, jamming the handcuffs behind her back to be level with her shoulder blades.
"I scratched his arm with my pinkie to let him know he was hurting me," Ms Toms told the court.
The footage shows Price swinging her off the counter, grabbing her by the hair before body-slamming her into the floor of the police station as two female officers look on.
He holds her in a spine lock, pinning her with his knee, as a fellow female officer pads her down and removes her earrings, before flinging her back off the ground on to the counter.
"He lifted me by the hair, my feet swinging in the air," Ms Toms told the court.
"That's when I noticed blood dripping down off my face, that's when I got upset.
"I told them: 'You can't get away with this'.
"I started swearing and being rude. I felt like I had a right to be upset at that time."
Toms told the court how she was drunk and flirty with police when picked up for questioning over the "joke theft" of a wallet from a friend in Mama Africa nightclub in Airlie Beach but the night quickly turned sour as Price allegedly assaulted her.
Price will face Bowen District Court at a date yet to be set.
New Mulrunji inquest ordered
New inquest into Palm Island death of Mulrunji Doomadgee
Courier Mail
June 16, 2009 10:26am
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25643646-3102,00.html
.THE Court of Appeal has ordered the re-opening of a coronial inquest into the death of Mulrunji Doomadgee which led to the 2004 Palm Island riots.
The Court found while a judge had made the correct decision to set aside a coroner's finding on Mulrunji's death he had done it on a "flawed" basis.
Therefore the matter had to go back to a re-opened inquiry.
It will be the third coronial inquest into the death after the original inquiry by State Coroner Michael Barnes was stopped after an application by the Queensland Police Union.
In 2006, Deputy State Coroner Christine Clements found Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley was responsible for the death in custody of Mulrunji after he was arrested on a public nuisance charge .
However, in 2007, Sen-Sgt Hurley was acquitted by a jury of manslaughter and assault charges over the death.
Then in December last year, in the District Court in Townsville, Judge Bob Pack set aside the findings of Ms Clements on how Mulrunji died and ordered the inquest to be reopened.
Mulrunji's family and the Palm Island Aboriginal Council took the decision to the Court of Appeal asking that Judge Pack's decision be overturned..
In an unanimous judgment today, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal but then set aside the findings of Ms Clements on how Mulrunji died.
Read the judgment in full here
http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2009/QCA09-167.pdf
"We conclude the finding of the coroner (Ms Clements) that punching by Mr Hurley caused the fatal injuries sustained by the deceased was not reasonably open on the evidence.
"Accordingly, the decision of the District Court that this finding by the coroner should be set aside was correct even though the process of reasoning whereby the judge arrived at that decision was flawed.
"We emphasise that we are not to be taken as expressing a view as to what findings of fact should ultimately be made – that is not this court's function,"
It then ordered the inquest be re-opened but with a different coroner to examine how Mulrunji died.
Outside court, Sam Watson, an Aboriginal community worker, said he felt sorry for Mulrunji's family and the people of Palm Island.
He said it appeared a case where police were trying to conceal the truth and rewrite history.
"I was hoping the court today would have closed it off ...it should have been allowed to rest there," Mr Watson said.
However, Acting President of the Queensland Police Union, Ian Leavers, said the union welcomed the decision and would continue to support Sgt Hurley every step of the way
Thug Qld cops at it again
Ninemsn story
'Police assault' video sparks inquiry
12:30 AEST Sun Apr 19 2009
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/803334/police-bashing-video-sparks-i...
(this link will take you to the video)
A crusading mother has won a police review of her son’s alleged assault at a Gold Coast police station after posting a video of the incident on YouTube.
The online video shows her handcuffed son being slammed into the ground by a police officer allegedly because he refused to remove his socks, the Sunday Mail newspaper reports.
The incident reportedly left the 19-year-old building worker with a $30,000 dental bill for a fractured jaw and seven broken teeth.
The man's mother has since uploaded security camera vision of the incident — which took place in October 2007 — with the message "this could be your child".
The footage does not have any sound but it does show the teenager, who does not wish to be named, standing at the counter of the police station and then removing some footwear.
The teenager allegedly then refused to remove his socks on request from police.
A male officer standing beside him then forces the teenager face-first into the ground. When he rolls over, a dark patch appears to be visible on the ground below his face.
The clip shows the officer walking away as the teenager struggles to his feet.
Last year an investigation into the incident by Queensland Police’s Ethical Standards Command cleared the officer involved of using excessive force.
But now publicity surrounding the video has prompted Queensland Police Minister Neil Roberts to order a new report into the incident from Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson.
The building worker's mother told the newspaper her son could not remember the alleged assault, which happened after he was arrested following a brawl at a party earlier in the night.
"My son has been to jail before — he's not a saint," she said.
"He's stolen a car, he's been in a couple of fights."
Court told police officer bashed tourist, shoved hose in his mou
Court told police officer bashed tourist, shoved hose in his mouth
By Peter Michael
Courier Mail
April 02, 2009 12:00am
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25276341-952,00.html
A FORMER Queensland police officer allegedly bashed and kicked a handcuffed tourist unconscious before nearly drowning him by jamming a fire hose into his mouth.
Former senior constable Benjamin Thomas Price, 32, yesterday faced Proserpine Court for committal on six counts of assault on three victims.
Police whistleblower Constable Bree Sonter broke down in tears as video of the alleged attack outside Airlie Beach police station was shown to the court.
The emotional father of the alleged victim stunned the court as he stood and yelled: "You're a brave man Price, I hope you get a fire hose jammed up your a - - - in jail".
Timothy Steele, 24, a plasterer from NSW, suffered a broken nose, black eyes, a head wound, hearing problems, memory loss and lack of sensation in his arms and hands after his arrest in the popular Whitsundays tourist town on May 24 last year.
He told the court he was trying to break-up a fight between two mates when he was capsicum sprayed by Sonter. It is alleged Price led the handcuffed Steele to a police car before saying "watch your head" and smashing his face into the vehicle, knocking him unconscious.
Price allegedly dragged Steele from the car outside Airlie Beach watchhouse, repeatedly punched him and "kicked him with his boots" in the face, breaking his nose.
CCTV video footage from the police station shows a dazed, heavily bleeding Steele being dragged into an alley beside the watchhouse. It shows the handcuffed man being punched in the head before having a fire hose jammed into his mouth, where it was held for up to 90 seconds as another officer watches.
Steele screams and groans in agony and blood can be seen sheeting down the concrete path as the policeman stands on the handcuffs, pressing his hand into the back of the man's neck, forcing his head into his lap in a brutal spine lock.
"I felt like I was going to drown," Steele told the court.
"He jammed the hose into my mouth. I couldn't breathe. I was coughing and spluttering blood. It was pretty scary. It went on for a long time.
"I called him a pussy. He knocked me about. I was pretty dazed, I'd had a boot to my face, my nose was broken. I was choking on my own blood, I felt like I was drowning."
Constable Sonter, now based at Sandgate, broke down as she told how she could hear Steele screaming for help.
"I could hear Price yelling 'you like that' and then a smack sound, it sounded like a punch, and Steele went quiet," she told the court.
The strongly built former officer, who now works as a tree-cutter, also allegedly repeatedly punched another man in the face during an argument about urinating in public.
He also is accused of assaulting tourist Renee Tomms.
Price, who has not yet entered a plea, is represented by Queensland Police Union barrister Steve Zillman.
Fighting for info
If you need to pursue documents from the Cops , ESC or CMC through FOI and through the FOI Commissioner , such as a film or some other document because they are either alleging something against you , or are attempting to put a defence to the media for instance , and you may also need this info for a civil action against them , natural justice dictates that you be allowed to meet their arguments or defence and that you be entitled to documents (including film and audio etc) to refute or rebutt it .
When I was attempting to find out what so called intelligence they had on me , and to obtain ESC audio tapes of interviews with cops for civil action , I had to appeal their refusal to divulge to the FOI commissioner . They can be taken to have refused if you havent been given info and they stay quite. A refusal to divulge is supposed to be a criminal offence under the FOI Act , and should also constitute consipiring to pervert by delaying justice.
I used these 2 cases on Natural Justice :
Veal v MIMIA [2003] FCA 437 at [29], [48] and [50]
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2003/437.html
and WA v Ward (1997) 145 ALR 512 which found that natural justice was a implied under ch3 of the constitution.
They had to show their documents to the commissioner and I was given a lot more which proved what they were saying was bullshit . They still would not allow some blacked out words and phrases to be seen (see the above article).
Pat
Watchdog turns into lapdog
COMMENT: Tony Koch | February 27, 2009
Article from: The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25112618-7583,00.html
THE Mabuiag Island rape scandal is just another example of how impotent Queensland's Crime and Misconduct Commission has become.
The organisation, which costs taxpayers $40 million a year, handed the case of the nurse raped in quarters provided by the Health Department - and the Health Department's response - back to the Health Department to investigate. It does the same with most complaints, including those about police using a Taser gun on a 16-year-old girl being held down on the ground, which were handed back to the police.
We have been waiting four years - and still are - for the result of the CMC inquiry, given over to the police, into the investigation of the death of Cameron Doomadgee at the Palm Island watchhouse.
Former premier Peter Beattie watered down the powers of the CMC, formerly the CJC, so much that the organisation is now an expensive ornament serving no real purpose.
The Opposition claims the CMC has gone from watchdog to lapdog. That is difficult to reject, given the overwhelming evidence. The CMC should be abolished, as this latest case clearly shows.
For a rape investigation to be given back to an inept department to investigate itself is an insult to the intelligence of all citizens, and another slap in the face to the attacked nurse. The Health Department did not provide safe accommodation on Mabuiag Island, despite having been warned for four years that the situation was critical. It then treated her with disdain when she was so dreadfully assaulted.
Now, a year later, the officer on Thursday Island is stood down. That should have happened the morning after The Australian reported the matter a year ago.
Yet again, the Health Department has shown it is not capable of running its own affairs, and the Queensland Government has yet again relied on the wimpy CMC to get it off the hook.
It is to be hoped that parents who have daughters working in remote parts of Queensland as nurses, teachers, police or in other public service positions note how the Bligh Government values their children, and give it appropriate consideration when casting their vote on March 21.
What chance Mike Reynolds going independent?
Magnetic Times
November 13th 2008
http://www.magnetictimes.com/index.php?ID=2947
see also :http://www.magnetictimes.com/index.php?ID=2976
Call to follow Tom Aikens
Bill of Rights and Greens' activist Pat Coleman calls on labor Member for Townsville, Mike Reynolds, to take a leaf out of, former independent and maverick Townsville politician, Tom Aiken's, book.
If media reports are to be believed, Mike Reynolds has described the Qld government as culturally incompetent.
Mike, got news for you mate, its not that they are incompetent, the labor party has lost the last vestiges of any idealism it had and has replaced it with a doctrine of “do what you can get away with”.
In short the Qld labor party, and it will become obvious the federal mob as well, places power above principle .
When a labor government sides with dodgy coppers and also sides with dodgy developers , you know that labor has become everything it once despised.
I reckon that if Mike and mates were smart they would take a leaf out of Tom Aikens book and go it alone to send a message to labor as a whole.
Pat Coleman
Replies 2
Call to follow Tom Aikens
Writer Comments
chasmac The member for Townsville South, who was the longest serving member of the Queensland Parliament, knew how to go for the jugular. He once suggested the then-Premier was so narrow minded he could look through a keyhole with both eyes at once.
Pat Coleman And , I might add , that a royal commission into the Hurley investigation alone wont cut it mike .
It has to be widened to include the effectiveness of the CMC , ESC and complaints mechanisms since Fitzgerald and policing in Qld per se, not just Aboriginal communities (with all respect to the aboriginal community).
There is a pattern
www.cynicismcentral.org/node/32
_________________________________________________________________
Government divided over Palm Island Royal Commission PRINT FRIENDLY EMAIL STORY
PM - Friday, 19 December , 2008 18:22:00
Reporter: Annie Guest
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2451586.htm
MARK COLVIN: In Queensland, the Government is divided on whether there should be a Royal Commission into the Palm Island affair.
The Parliamentary Speaker, who's also the local member for the Palm Island area, has broken ranks with the Premier to call for a wide-ranging examination of the issues surrounding a 2004 death in custody.
But Anna Bligh says she doesn't believe a Royal Commission is necessary.
The debate has been sparked by a court order to re-open a coronial inquest and set aside earlier findings that a policeman repeatedly hit an Aboriginal prisoner.
Annie Guest reports from Brisbane.
ANNIE GUEST: Four years on since the man known as Mulrunji Doomadgee died in police custody, many people hold outstanding concerns and questions about the tragedy.
They want a Royal Commission, but they can't convince the Queensland Premier, Anna Bligh.
ANNA BLIGH: Well this has been through numerous legal processes.
I'm not convinced that a Royal Commission would identify anything further that hasn't already been the subject of extensive legal consideration.
ANNIE GUEST: Her own colleague, Mike Reynolds, disagrees.
MIKE REYNOLDS: A Royal Commission is required to absolutely ensure that we can focus in and interrogate and investigate every aspect of this matter that a coroner can't do.
ANNIE GUEST: The Parliamentary Speaker's electorate takes in Palm Island.
He's broken ranks before, labelling the police commissioner culturally incompetent over the timing of bravery awards for Palm Island officers.
The death and four years following has been a complex and sorry saga that's included a riot, inquiries, court cases, concerns about police, question marks over the DPP, suicides, gaolings and bravery awards for police.
So Mike Reynolds is urging his leader to change her mind about a Royal Commission
MIKE REYNOLDS: It should be transparent, it should be open and every area of policing and justice should be accountable.
So, I am unhappy in that regard. I'm not going to prejudge these matters.
ANNIE GUEST: After Mulrunji's death police were criticised for inaction during the tragedy and for their investigation into the death.
Mike Reynolds wants police to release their original report into the death in custody ahead of the re-opening of the coronial inquest.
It's expected next year, after a court upheld an appeal by Sergeant Hurley and set aside coronial findings that he repeatedly hit Mulrunji, before he died of severe internal injuries on a cell floor.
It didn't set aside the central conclusion that Sergeant Hurley caused Mulrunji's death. Regardless, the officer feels vindicated.
Palm Island's former mayor, Robert Blackley, says residents are further disillusioned and traumatised.
ROBERT BLACKLEY: Just leave us alone Chris. Go away and don't come back.
ANNIE GUEST: The officer's lawyer, Glen Cranny, says his client is mindful of the ongoing effect on the Doomadgee family.
GLEN CRANNY: He fully understands their distress but having said that he's also been through an extraordinarily difficult time himself. He wanted to clear his name.
ANNIE GUEST: Palm Island residents are looking for the opposite outcome from a long-called for, but unlikely, Royal Commission.
ROBERT BLACK: I only want one recommendation out of this and that's Chris Hurley be retried for manslaughter.
ANNIE GUEST: Sergeant Hurley was acquitted of manslaughter last year.
But far from a retrial, Glen Cranny says now that a court has set aside some of the worst coronial findings made against his client, the path is open for another coroner to make a more favourable ruling.
GLEN CRANNY: The effect of the ruling yesterday is not to order a new inquest. There is not to be another inquest. The effect of the ruling is to re-open the previous inquest. The Coroner who is appointed to re-open the inquest will be able to, if he or she wishes, to take into account all of the evidence that has already been heard, and to simply come up with new findings.
ANNIE GUEST: That's not necessarily right, according to the academic whose work helped establish the Coronial Court in Queensland.
Justin Malbon is now a Professor of Law at Monash University.
JUSTIN MALBON: Generally speaking what the Coroner will do is start afresh. The Coroner is really required to investigate a particular death to find out what caused that death and then also make recommendations as to what should be done to avoid similar deaths in the future.
MARK COLVIN: Professor Justin Malbon from Monash University, ending that report from Annie Guest.
He's out- update
Mike is retiring and will not contest the March 21st 2009 Qld state Election.
Link: 2nd Coronial Inquest Report for Mulrunji
This is a link to the coronial report into the death of Mulrunji .
http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/mulrunji270906.pdf
Editorial: Doomadgee affair demands an inquiry
Doomadgee affair demands an inquiry
December 20, 2008
Article from: The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24825137-16741,00.html
Flaws in Queensland law enforcement must be remedied
QUEENSLAND has come a long way in the past 20 years. But the state's response to the death in custody of Mulrunji Doomadgee is an embarrassing throwback to the bad old days of hillbilly justice.
The flaws that have been highlighted by the Doomadgee affair are so serious that a remedy is beyond the capacity of the judiciary. The state Government can no longer wash its hands of this affair and allow justice to take its course. In this case, justice has been undermined. Premier Anna Bligh must act.
A broad inquiry by the Crime and Misconduct Commission is now necessary as a first step towards repairing the flaws at the heart of the law and justice system that have been highlighted by this affair.
No matter how hard judges and coroners might try, they cannot overcome the scandalous lack of professionalism among police that is the real issue in the Doomadgee affair. This cannot be allowed to happen again.
Modern Queensland, which leads the nation is so many areas, must be cringing over the bumpkin-like shenanigans that have made it impossible to ever determine what really happened in the hours before Doomadgee died a lonely, painful death in the police watchhouse on Palm Island.
This week's instalment in the saga is yet another inadequate response. Townsville District Court judge Bob Pack has overturned the coroner's finding that Mr Doomadgee died as a result of punches thrown by Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley.
Sergeant Hurley was acquitted of manslaughter last year.
There is now a huge gulf in this affair. If the policeman was not responsible for Doomadgee's death, who was? Did he cleave his own liver in two?
At first blush, it might look as though a second coronial inquest - which was ordered by the judge - might find some answers. But it won't.
All that will happen is that another judicial officer will review the evidence that was placed before the first coroner. Because of the seriousness of this matter, it would be appropriate for this responsibility to be given to a judge, rather than a coroner.
But whoever reviews the evidence will be in an impossible position: the evidence, because of amateurish conduct by police, is incomplete and tainted by the perception of bias. The police who gathered that evidence were Sergeant Hurley's friends - people who socialised with him before asking him how Doomadgee died.
They shared a beer and a meal before getting down to the business of establishing what had happened. That would certainly have damaged community confidence in the impartiality of the police.
But what are we to make of the later conduct by Sergeant Hurley's colleagues? They co-operated with the prosecution in the manslaughter trial only after being ordered to do so by the Police Commissioner.
All sworn officers should understand that their duty - their only duty - is to assist law enforcement and the justice system. Helping mates is an indulgence that must be abandoned when police take their oath of office. They serve the law, not each other.
Even if the second inquest were inclined to take fresh evidence, that too would be impossible. It is more than four years since this tragic incident and many of the people with something to say are dead.
The second inquest, therefore, will be unable to come to grips with the specifics of this case. It will tell us nothing new about the death of Doomadgee and will merely be drawing conclusions on the basis of an incomplete set of facts.
The shocking truth, therefore, is that if someone is responsible for the death of Doomadgee, that person will probably get away with it - thanks to police ineptitude.
The lax approach by police to this man's death forms a sharp contrast with the rigour with which police pursued the rioters who later damaged police property on Palm Island. Lex Wotton was jailed last month for six years for his role in that riot.
So while Queensland justice holds nobody responsible for a man's death, the same system has acted promptly - and appropriately - to punish a man for an offence against property.
While the botched inquiry by the police has made it impossible to know what really happened in the Palm Island watchhouse, it is not too late to prevent a repeat of this affair. The law enforcement system is responsible for this tragedy, and it is the system that needs reform.
The Crime and Misconduct Commission, which has the powers of a standing royal commission, was established to address exactly this sort of problem. It should be given a wide brief and told to get to the bottom of what went wrong inside the police force. Of necessity, that will require a fresh attempt to get to the truth of this case. But the primary goal must be to identify, and then remedy, the systemic failures within the police force.
In the quest for truth, the commission stands a far better chance of succeeding than a mere court. It can compel people to give evidence and is not bound by the rules of evidence that limit the information than can be placed before criminal courts.
Even if lax policing enjoys the support of some of those in rural Queensland, it is anathema elsewhere. And with a state election not too far away, Ms Bligh might be held to account unless she can show that her Government supports one standard of law enforcement for all Queenslanders.
The issue of bias
R v Szabo
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/qld/QCA/2000/194.html?query=title(r%20%20and%20%20szabo)
Of course the coppers wern't rooting each other like in the above case but it goes to independence.
You will have to copy and paste the link into your browser.
MP and solicitor call for royal commission
Andrew Fraser and Sarah Elks | December 20, 2008
Article from: The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24826014-5006786,00.html
PRESSURE is growing on the Bligh Government to establish a royal commission into the events that led to the death of Mulrunji Doomadgee on Palm Island four years ago.
District Court judge Robert Park on Thursday rejected previous coronial findings that Doomadgee had died as a result of three punches thrown by Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley, and recommended the inquest be reopened next year.
But the Queensland parliament's Speaker and the member for the electorate that contains Palm Island, Mike Reynolds, said yesterday only a royal commission could clear the air. The call was backed by Palm Island indigenous leaders.
Mr Reynolds said a royal commission would have more powers than an inquest. One area that needed scrutiny was the original investigation by officers from Townsville.
"This whole area of police investigating other police is one that needs to be clarified," he said. "It needs to be part of an open, transparent process, and there's signs in this instance that that's not been the case."
The Queensland Police Service has undertaken a review of the investigation, but despite the events happening four years ago, the results of the investigation were handed to the state's Crime and Misconduct Commission only three weeks ago.
A spokesman for the CMC said that their review of the police investigation would most likely be released next week.
Andrew Boe, the solicitor representing Doomadgee's family, also called for a royal commission, pointing out that Sergeant Hurley had on two occasions given evidence that his physical contact with Doomadgee had killed him.
Palm Island Mayor Alf Lacey said a royal commission was necessary as it would give "some certainty to uncertain issues that remain".
"If we can't get an answer from a royal commission, then it goes back to the point that indigenous people say about justice: When will there be justice for indigenous people?"
Mr Lacey said the community was calm in the wake of the District Court's decision to reopen the inquest. "Everything's generally OK ... It's a couple of days coming into Christmas and people are looking forward to spending time with their families; it's putting a dampener on the atmosphere," he said. "But Palm is a bit too strong to be worried about going back into the gutters."
Former mayor and manager of the Palm Island safe haven for women and children Delena Foster said a royal commission would help to give closure to the Doomadgee family and the broader community.
"The death in custody really rocked our community," she said. "In this day and age, you wouldn't think that would happen ... You could see the recommendations from the royal commission into deaths in custody weren't even in place."
Police can and do lie
The following case , “John Dennis Tegg” (1982) 7th Volume of The Australian Criminal Reports beginning at page 188 , and with the relevant statements at pages 200 -201, is authority that there is no presumption operating in favour of police evidence, that simply because someone is a cop that they wouldn’t lie.
See also the Canadian case od “R v RDS” http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?language=en&searchTitle=Nova+S...
What is required is a bill of rights with a substantive free standing section that all are equal before the laws to reflect this. The Qld anti discrimination act only has it as a title and the Qld Acts interpretation act provides that it is not actually part of the act.
Townsville Bulletin article : Hurley
(The paper actually printed the article with the heading "Coroner's initial finding set aside" with a big black by-line "Hurley's triumph" on p 3 )
Townsville Bulletin
Doomadgee inquest to be reopened
MALCOLM WEATHERUP
December 19th, 2008
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2008/12/19/28931_hpnews.html
THE Coroner's inquest into the death-in-custody of Palm Island man Mulrunji Doomadgee is to be reopened, and the circumstances of his death re-examined by another coroner.
The reopening was ordered yesterday by District Judge Bob Pack, who set aside the findings by the then-Acting State Coroner Christine Clements that Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley `lost his temper and hit Mulrunji after falling to the floor inside the Palm Island police station, thereby causing the fatal injuries' and that `he hit Mulrunji while he was on the floor a number of times'.
Judge Pack decided the available facts didn't measure up to Coroner Clements' conclusions.
"I am satisfied those findings cannot reasonably be supported by the evidence .... and I conclude the Coroner's findings are against the weight of the evidence," Judge Pack wrote in his judgment.
"The medical evidence does not favour the conclusion that the fatal injury was caused by punching. In my opinion, the medical evidence was significantly stronger that a conclusion that a knee or elbow in the course of the fall was a possible means by which the injury occurred."
Judge Pack made his findings when ruling in favour of an application by Sen-Sgt Hurley that the coroner's findings be set aside.
In a 24-page judgment, the judge said he did not believe that all the medical evidence had been understood, that the coroner had not given that evidence `sufficient weight' and that some of the inferences against Hurley, which played a significant role in the coroner's conclusions, should not have been drawn.
"There is evidence supporting the proposition Hurley fell on Mulrunji (so) the hypothosis of an accidental death cannot reasonably be excluded," the judge wrote.
Judge Pack was of the opinion that Coroner Clements relied more than she should have on other inferences in evidence, including an `erroneous recollection' by a witness in the police station.
Judge Pack questioned the reasoning on a number of issues in Cornoner Clement's findings, including her conclusion that Sen-Sgt Hurley changed his evidence when he learned the extent and nature of the injuries that led to Mulrunji's death.
"(The coroner's) reference to `belated recollection' and `changed evidence' appears to me to be an inappropriate description," he said.
Judge Pack also questioned the conclusion that the police officer had lost his temper, either when punched on the way into the police station, or because of the fall.
"It is difficult to conclude that a police officer, who was experiencing something common enough in nearly 20 years of service, would have lost his temper, even after a fall."
There was a muted and measured reponse on Palm Island to the news.
Mayor Alf Lacey said that on legal advice, there was little he could say, except that he had been advised by lawyers for Mulrunji's family that there may be grounds to appeal against Judge Pack's findings.
He said he did not believe this new development in the long-running tragedy would result in any public disturbance.
He said islanders were just getting ready for a quiet Christmas after a turbulent couple of years, and the feeling was that the legal side of things would be allowed to run its course.
The police union also kept a low profile.
Spokesman Ross Musgrove said the union was pleased with Judge Pack's findings because they supported the union's stance from the beginning.
He said Sen-Sgt Hurley was relieved by the outcome.
"But everybody knows that this is just yet another step in a long process, and none of us must lose sight of the fact that the Doomadgee family have lost a loved one," Mr Musgrove said.
Queensland Premier Anna Bligh said she understood some people would be upset by the decision.
"I understand there would be a number of people distressed that there will be another inquest into the death of this young man, but in our legal system people are entitled to seek an appeal,'' Ms Bligh said.
``That's what's happened here and I think that reflects the health of our system."
Judge overturns Mulrunji Doomadgee death finding
(It is to be remembered that Judge Pack was appointed by the Nationals)
Judge overturns Mulrunji Doomadgee death finding
Padraic Murphy | December 19, 2008
Article from: The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24821780-2702,00.html
A JUDGE has overturned a coroner's finding that Mulrunji Doomadgee died in Palm Island watchhouse as a result of three punches thrown by Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley.
Although a jury last year acquitted Sergeant Hurley of manslaughter, a finding by Queensland deputy coroner Christine Clements that the death was a result of the policeman's actions was being used by Doomadgee's family as the basis for a compensation claim.
Townsville District Court judge Bob Pack sparked outrage among indigenous groups yesterday by ordering that a new inquest be held with a new coroner next year.
"I conclude the coroner's findings are against the weight of the evidence," he said. "The coroner was not obliged to refer to all the evidence. However, I think evidence supporting competing hypotheses was worthy of mention. It is not clear the weight of the medical evidence was understood.
"The specific findings that 'the appellant lost his temper and hit Mulrunji after falling to the floor inside the Palm Island police station thereby causing the fatal injuries to Mulrunji' and that 'Hurley had responded with physical force and hit Mulrunji whilst he was on the floor a number of times' are set aside."
Judge Pack also said a further inquest might clear Sergeant Hurley, as a hypothesis of an accidental death could not be discounted.
The decision was delivered to a near-empty courtroom and was not listed on court lists.
The court alerted media outlets just hours before the decision was handed down and Palm Island residents learned of the decision only after media calls for comment.
"We haven't heard anything about this. The community will be upset. It's so close to Christmas," said Palm Island Mayor Alf Lacey.
Townsville indigenous leader Gracelyn Smallwood said it was another disgraceful day for race relations in this country.
"Here we are in the most racist part of Australia, with brother Mulrunji dead in a police station, with other brothers in jail over the riot, and the police and the Government getting off scot-free," she said.
"This is simply a disgrace, bully boys getting their own way while Aboriginal people suffer."
Mulrunji's 2004 death led to riots that destroyed the courthouse and police barracks. Last month, ringleader Lex Wotton was jailed.
"Lex is in jail, Mulrunji's dead. It's our people who get locked up, we pay the price," Wotton's wife, Cecilia, said yesterday.
Queensland's powerful police union, which has strongly supported Sergeant Hurley, was pleased with the District Court's decision.
"We always believed that the CMC (Crime and Misconduct Commission) and the DPP were correct in their determinations that what had occurred was a tragic accident," said union president Cameron Pope. "That stance has been supported by the judgment today."
But Mr Pope, who said he had spoken to Sergeant Hurley yesterday, was more conciliatory than previous union leaders, stressing that the union and Mr Hurley were both "acutely aware" of the Doomadgee family's loss.
"It should be remembered though, through all these court cases, there are no winners," he said. "All of us, particularly Chris, are acutely aware that the Doomadgee family have still lost a loved one."
Mulrunji died from massive internal bleeding caused by a split liver that happened while he was being taken into custody for public nuisance on November 14, 2004.
In September 2006, Ms Clements found Sergeant Hurley responsible for the death, finding Mulrunji had died as a result of excessive force.
"I find that Senior Sergeant Hurley hit Mulrunji whilst he was on the floor a number of times in direct response to himself having been hit in the jaw and then falling to the floor," Ms Clements told a packed Townsville courtroom. "I conclude that these actions of Senior Sergeant Hurley caused the fatal injuries."
Judge Pack said although Mulrunji had punched the 2m-tall Sergeant Hurley, the officer was unlikely to have retaliated or become violent because it should be assumed he
had commonly encountered aggression and resistance from intoxicated persons.
Judge Pack also fired a broadside at Ms Clements's understanding of medical evidence presented at the inquest.
"The coroner's conclusion that punches were delivered by Hurley while Mulrunji was on the floor appears to have been fortified by what she described as the overall sequence of events and perhaps her understanding of the medical evidence, having stated this, is also consistent with the medical evidence of the injuries that caused Mulrunji's death," he wrote in yesterday's judgment. "As I have indicated, the medical evidence does not favour the conclusion the fatal injury was caused by punching."
Judge Pack also said comments made by Sergeant Hurley did not mean he assaulted Mulrunji. "Even if the words 'Have you had enough Mr Doomadgee? Do you want more?' were stated and repeated, it does not lead to an inference to the exclusion of competing hypotheses that Hurley had punched and/or kneed Mulrunji shortly before such words were spoken. It was not therefore critical."
Article:Royal commission only route
Royal commission only route
COMMENT: Tony Koch | December 19, 2008
Article from: The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24821739-5013479,00.html
QUEENSLAND Premier Anna Bligh should now establish a royal commission to inquire into the death in police custody of Mulrunji Doomadgee.
Judge Robert Pack's ruling yesterday that coroner Christine Clements' findings, that Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley was responsible for the death of Mulrunji on November 19, 2004, should be re-examined by another coroner come as no surprise to anybody with the barest knowledge of this tragic case.
Because of the disgracefully inadequate and shoddy "investigation" into the death in custody by Townsville-based police, several of whom were close friends of Hurley, Clements was presented with only half the truth.
The police involved in the Hurley case have been investigated, but the results have not been released, even though it has taken more than two years. In that time, several have been promoted in rank.
Nobody has suggested Hurley deliberately set out to kill Mulrunji, but he admitted at the trial last year at which he was found not guilty of manslaughter that his actions must have resulted in the man's death.
That is obvious; nobody else touched him. But the whole truth will not come from any coronial inquest because the key evidence - the statements taken and investigation done by the police - lacked the professionalism to ensure that all possibilities were covered.
There were three other police at the scene when Mulrunji was taken into the cell - and none of them saw anything that resembled an unlawful assault by Hurley. In fact one of them, police liaison officer Bengaroo, made sure he saw nothing by deliberately not looking, according to his evidence.
Another who had been there for just a day, said he saw his sergeant and the Aboriginal prisoner fall to the floor, but he did not get up from his desk to assist or to investigate further. That does not seem to be the usual response of police who have a colleague who might be in trouble in an apparently violent incident.
However, that was his evidence and investigating police apparently considered it quite plausible.
The only possible way to get to the truth is to have a royal commission, where all people involved have to tell all the truth. That would be the fair outcome for Hurley and also the grieving Doomadgee family.
Anything less would merely be a continuation of a shameful farce that has brought no credit whatever on the people involved whose responsibility it is to ensure that justice is delivered without fear or favour.
Senior officer pleads guilty in watchhouse bashing case
Related articles: http://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22craig+stuart+ablitt%22+%2B+assault&...
Senior officer pleads guilty in watchhouse bashing case
Tony Keim
Courier Mail Article
November 25, 2008 12:00am
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24699538-3102,00.html
A POLICE officer faces up to two years' jail after pleading guilty to being an accessory to the beating of a woman at a Brisbane watchhouse in 2004.
Senior Constable Craig Stuart Ablitt pleaded guilty in the Beenleigh District Court to being an accessory after the fact in the assault of Dulcie Isobelle Birt, 25, by disgraced fellow officer Justin Anthony Burkett.
Burkett, 35, was sentenced to three years' jail, to be suspended after nine months, in August last year after pleading guilty to perjury, attempting to pervert the course of justice and assault causing bodily harm.
Burkett admitted bashing Birt in a cell at Loganholme Police Station watchhouse on April 5, 2004.
Ablitt, 51, was scheduled to stand trial yesterday on charges of perjury and attempting to pervert the course of justice. However, prosecutor Mark Whitbread presented a fresh indictment charging Ablitt with the lesser charge of being an accessory to Ms Birt's assault.
Mr Whitbread said the Crown accepted the plea to the lesser count in complete discharge of the more serious charges.
A visibly relieved Ablitt, who was accompanied to court by a small group of family and friends, was granted immediate bail pending his sentencing this week.
Ablitt, Burkett and Burkett's then live-in partner, Constable Nicole Helen Castley, 30, were charged in November 2006 after allegedly giving false testimony or sworn statements against Birt.
Charges against Castley were dropped last year.
Ablitt maintained his innocence until minutes before he was arraigned by Judge Ian Dearden yesterday.
During Burkett's sentencing hearing, the court was told Birt was attacked shortly after she was taken into custody for suspected shoplifting and argued with Burkett, who pushed her into a watchhouse cell.
A 10-second video recording of the attack showed Birt being flung into the cell, followed by Burkett, who grabbed her by the shoulders and pushed her back against the cell wall.
The video was turned off - allegedly by Ablitt - after it showed Burkett walking towards Birt with his fist clenched
COPS AND STATE CANNOT BE PROUD OF THEMSELVES - JUDGE
Lex Wotton jailed for rioting
MALCOLM WEATHERUP
Townsville Bulletin
November 8th, 2008
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2008/11/08/21381_hpnews.html
ABORIGINAL activist Lex Wotton, a leader of the Palm Island riot in November 2004, has been jailed for six years.
He will have to serve at least two years of his term, but because 110 days he has already spent in custody awaiting sentence was declared time already served, he will be able to apply for parole after June 18, 2010.
Judge Michael Shanahan told Wotton that a sentence of seven years was merited for a key figure in a civil disturbance which eventually cost more than $4 million, but the sentence was reduced by a year because twice during the riot, Wotton moved people away to allow the police to retreat safely.
Yet Judge Shanahan was also scathing in his comments about the police investigation into the death in custody of Mulrunji Doomadgee, and suggested in subsequent responses, both the State and the Commonwealth `cannot be proud of themselves'.
He said the appointment of Detective Darren Robinson to investigate the death in custody was wrong, given he was to investigate a friend and a superior officer.
On November 26, 2004, a mob of islanders went on a fiery, rock-throwing rampage, after an open-air meeting heard details of the injuries to Mulrunji Doomadgee, the man who had died in police custody a week earlier.
After four years of legal manoeuvering, a Brisbane jury two weeks ago found Wotton guilty of incitement.
The final chapter in that four-year saga started when the 41-year-old Wotton, dressed in a smart dark suit, orange shirt and red tie, was led to the dock at 9.52am yesterday.
He was greeted with hesitant, muted applause and a shouted `We love you, brother' from the public gallery, which was largely restricted to family and friends.
Such was the national interest that media from around the country was seated in the 12 jury box chairs.
Prosecutor Michael Cowan produced precedent cases to back his call for a sentence `starting at 10 years', adding that he couldn't be more specific than that because there were no other like cases on record.
He asked the judge to note that on the Tuesday prior to the riot, Wotton had said, "What do you have to do to get action, burn government buildings down?".
"(His offending) included elements of premeditation," the prosecutor said.
Sydney-based defence barrister Clive Steirn SC emphasised Wotton's general reputation as a solid community leader who overcame early life problems with alcohol and drugs to become a teetotaller, non-smoker, a qualified tradesman and a man interested in religion who had played a leadership role in the Palm community.
Mr Steirn suggested that on the day of the riot, trouble started brewing when the then mayor Erykah Kyle had read out a statement to a lunchtime meeting in the town square which said a post-mortem examination on Mr Doomadgee said his death had been an accident.
Defence counsel suggested because Ms Kyle had not said that there was to be a CMC investigation and a proper coronial inquiry to follow, the listeners understood that that would be the end of any official action on the death and became angry.
They were then stirred up by an angry Wotton.
Judge Shanahan told Wotton that the attack was not based on race, but on police of both sexes and all colours (including an indigenous officer).
"To riot against the police is an affront to the law, ... and what had gone before (Mulrunji's death) cannot excuse the lawlessness, and cannot be tolerated," the judge said.
Judge Shanahan, citing the `horror and terror' faced by the police, told Wotton his actions had damaged relations between police and the wider indigenous community in Queensland.
"You have done irreparable damage to yourself and your community," the judge said, and then passed sentence.
Relatives and friends appeared stunned by the outcome, and many appeared relieved, surprised and almost jubilant.
Wotton hugged his family, and tousled the hair of young nephews, telling them `uncle will be home soon', before being taken from the courtroom.
Lex Wotton's mother speaks – we can handle this
Townsville Bulletin
November 8th, 2008
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2008/11/08/21391_hpnews.html
A TENSE but united crowd gathered in support of convicted rioter Lex Wotton as he was sentenced in Townsville yesterday.
Supporters started arriving just after 8am, dressed in black, yellow and red and bearing signs and banners.
On the front lawn, children dressed brightly in yellow and red ran and played while their parents stood talking quietly in groups.
Wotton was found guilty last month for his part in the riot, which was sparked by the death of Cameron `Mulrunji' Doomadgee in the Palm Island watch-house.
Arresting officer Sen-Sgt Chris Hurley was found not guilty of Mr Doomadgee's manslaughter last year.
Police kept a low profile yesterday, and two uniformed constables patrolling the courtroom entrance were the only visible police presence.
One wore a distinctive blue wristband with the number 6747 – Sen-Sgt Hurley's police number – stamped on it.
The officer didn't want to speak to the Townsville Bulletin about the wristband, which was among 12,000 sold last year to help with Sen-Sgt Hurley's legal costs.
Wotton's supporters yesterday wore black armbands.
Former Palm Island resident Jai Cummings was dressed in tribal costume with face and body paint in red and white – which he said were the colours of war.
Wotton's younger sister Gail arrived in tears and was comforted by her partner as she approached the court.
As the crowd swelled, the voices grew louder and a hefty media scrum gathered as Aboriginal poet Marcella `Maggie' Walsh read her poem, Where is the Justice? Blackfella still Lookin'.
Elder and activist Gracelyn Smallwood spoke of a $100,000 payout made to Sen-Sgt Hurley.
"Not one Palm Island person has received any type of compensation," she said.
Ms Smallwood said Wotton was a sacrificial lamb and likened him to political prisoners such as Nelson Mandela.
Before the sentencing, Wotton's son Lex junior said he was `nervous' and afraid of his father going to jail.
"I don't really know what's going on, I just came to see my father now and see what's going on," he said.
Wotton's mother Agnes led a chant of `burundjeji', meaning `great warrior' and held her grandchildren's hands as they approached the courtroom.
His brother Gerald said Wotton meant `the world' to him.
Another brother, who did not want his name published, said Wotton `should not be punished for standing up for his brother when he had been killed'.
"People will move on, it's not about choice, it's not about destiny – it's about dignity," he said.
With just 14 seats allocated for family and friends of Lex Wotton, the rest settled into a long, hot wait for the result.
For more than three hours, supporters sat quietly on the grass under the trees.
The peace was broken once when a uniformed police officer crossed the road nearby – some supporters stood up and shouted `Shame, coppers, shame'.
At 1.20pm the news trickled through that a sentence had been reached, and some of the crowd heckled legal representatives as they left.
"How do you sleep at night?," one woman asked.
"The world's going to know about this racist town and this racist state," one man yelled.
But Gerald Wotton emerged smiling, his arms raised in victory.
As a woman screamed `speak the truth', Ms Smallwood said she had expected a sentence of 10 years to life for Wotton.
"We're asking for everybody to pray and we can start talking about reconciliation," she said.
"I believe that we can move on now, and heal."
Agnes Wotton said she was looking forward to celebrating her son's homecoming.
"Well at least I know I can go and visit my son now and be close to him and the family and keep the family together for the next 19 months," she said.
"This is something we can take on board and handle as a family.
"At least I can go to bed and have a decent sleep and know that his life is very strong – he's one child I don't have to worry about.
"I'm really pleased that it turned out the way it did."
The family were planning a belated celebration for Wotton's wedding to his long-time partner Cecilia on October 2.
After hearing the sentence, Cecilia Wotton said her husband had told her to stay strong while he was in jail.
She said she was looking forward to the day Wotton returned home to his family on Palm Island.
"He asked the kids to look after me and I look after them," she said.
"It's going to be very good (when he's released) because we can celebrate our marriage.
"I'm feeling OK – Lex makes me strong. He gave me a kiss and a cuddle and I told him that I love him and he loves me."
– KATHLEEN SKENE
Lex Wotton jailed for six years
November 6, 2008 - 11:13PM
Sydney Morning Herald
http://news.smh.com.au/national/lex-wotton-jailed-for-six-years-20081107...
Aboriginal leaders say relations between black and white communities in north Queensland can now begin to mend after Palm Island riot ringleader Lex Wotton received a much lesser prison sentence than expected.
Wotton, 41, was on Friday sentenced to six years jail, with a fixed parole date in July 2010, for his role in the 2004 riot - well short of the 10-year prison term his supporters had expected.
Aboriginal activist Gracelyn Smallwood told a cheering crowd outside the Townsville courthouse the result was a victory.
"We are very grateful and are hoping that black and white can come together and move on with the healing process," she said.
Wotton was found guilty of one count of rioting with destruction following a three-week trial in Brisbane District Court last month, but Judge Michael Shanahan adjourned sentencing to Friday.
The riot on November 26, 2004 - a week after the death in police custody of Aboriginal man Cameron Doomadgee - resulted in the island's police station and an officers' residence being burnt to the ground.
Judge Shanahan on Friday took aim at Queensland authorities who, he said, had mishandled the events following the death of Mr Doomadgee and contributed to community anger.
He said many Palm Islanders believed Mr Doomadgee's death would not be properly investigated after Detective Sergeant Darren Robinson, a friend of arresting officer Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley, was appointed to lead the probe.
Snr Sgt Hurley was last year acquitted of manslaughter, but admitted to accidentally causing Mr Doomadgee's death by falling on top of him with his knee protruding.
Residents were also not made aware that the Crime and Misconduct Commission and the state coroner would also investigate, Judge Shanahan said.
The riot erupted after the release of a pathologist's report which found Mr Doomadgee, whose liver had been cleaved in two, had died as a result of a fall.
However, Judge Shanahan said the community's understandable anger did not give them the right to riot.
"Whatever the justification, society cannot accept that this (riot) was an appropriate response," Judge Shanahan said.
He said many of the 22 police on the island at the time of the riot - who earlier this week received bravery awards - had feared for their lives and were still affected by it.
Prosecutor Michael Cowen had asked for Wotton to be sentenced to 10 years jail because he was a leader of the riots and was seen pouring petrol onto the police station.
He had also incited the riot by taking the microphone at the town meeting to declare "thing are going to burn" and ordered another island man to set fire to the officers' residence.
Mr Cowen also noted Wotton's criminal history, which included convictions for assaulting women and juveniles.
However, defence barrister Clive Steirn pleaded with Judge Shanahan, describing Mr Wotton as "a decent human being".
He said Wotton dedicated much of his spare time to improving the strife-ridden community and was the primary supporter of his family.
Mr Steirn also read a character reference from Townsville MP and Parliamentary Speaker Mike Reynolds who called the Palm Islander "an agent for change".
Mr Reynolds said the riot had helped draw the government's attention to the troubles facing Palm Island.
"There has probably been more done for Palm Island (since this riot) than there was in the decades previously," Mr Reynolds wrote.
Outside court, Wotton's mother Agnes Wotton said she was pleased her son would be home in 19 months.
"I think Lex is really strong. At least I can go to bed and have a decent sleep and know that ... (he) is very strong. He is one child I don't have to worry about," she said.
SEE ALSO NEWS LTD ARCHIVES
http://search.news.com.au/search?q=palm+island&sid=601&us=ndmtheaustrali...
On Ins Brian Richardson a player in my stuff and the Palm stuff
Accepting his award, retiring Townsville inspector says he bears no grudge
LEONIE JOHNSON
Townsville Bulletin
November 4th, 2008
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2008/11/04/20385_hpnews.html
ISOLATED and terrified, the police officer in charge of maintaining law and order on Palm Island feared for his new wife when the riot broke out.
Yesterday Inspector Brian Richardson and his wife, former police officer Kathy, were among 34 officers recognised for their bravery during the 2004 riot.
The officers were posted on the island to keep peace following the death in custody of Mulrunji Doomadgee.
About 250 fellow officers, family and friends gathered at the Aitkenvale PCYC for the ceremony.
Deputy Commissioner Kathy Rynders' voice wavered as she described the frightening ordeal the officers went through.
She told of their fear as sledgehammers were used to punch holes in the wall of the police station, and petrol was poured in then set on fire.
Officers armed themselves with cricket bats and shovels _ and wore bicycle helmets _ to confront the mob while rocks rained down on them.
Insp Richardson was one of three officers to receive a Valour Award, while his wife of four months was one of 16 to receive a Commissioner's Commendation for Bravery.
"I had the added problem at times of wondering where my wife was and making sure she was all right," he said.
"We had the confrontation going on and every now and then something would click in and say `where is my wife?'
"Kathy has been a police officer for 20 years and she can look after herself, I'll tell you that, but it was often in the back of my mind wondering where she was and whether she was OK."
Insp Richardson said that while there were no serious injuries, many police officers were still recovering emotionally after being stranded in a hostile situation, waiting for three hours for help to arrive.
"It's a very lonely experience when you're on an island and you have nowhere to go," he said.
"What really happened that day was a total breakdown of law and order.
"Some of the police are still hurting inside.
"It's what we were exposed to that day. A lot of people living on the island have also felt those traumas.
"What happened to us that day is something that sticks with you."
Insp Richardson said he bore no ill-will towards the Palm Islanders.
"Among the police I don't think there are any grudges there among the police who received their awards," he said.
"The majority of people on Palm Island are good people.
"To some extent I can understand their anger. However, we did try to tell them they should wait for the authorities to finish the proper process . . . but it didn't turn out that way.
"I think we need to put everything to rest and walk away and get on with our lives.
"I'd like to see everyone on both sides of the fence get on with their lives."
The award ceremony coincided with Insp Richardson's last day on the job.
He retired yesterday after 36 years with the Queensland Police Service.
"It's a great way to leave the police," he said.
"Anyone would love to go out in this manner.
"It's certainly a great way to leave the police service."
Awards were presented by Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson and Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson.
Three officers were also awarded with a Commissioner's Certificate of Notable Action for their bravery during a hazardous situation.
Another three police were given the Commissioner's Award for Meritorious Service.
Nine officers and civilians were also recognised for manning the communication room during the riot
Cross refference
Qld Cops “Ethical Standards Command” Delays warrants Crime and Misconduct Commission Act Amendment
www.cynicismcentral.org/node/49
Get counselling, Palm cop told
Get counselling, Palm cop told
Michael McKenna | November 04, 2008
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,24598588-2702,00.html
THE veteran policeman acquitted of manslaughter over the 2004 death in custody of Mulrunji Doomadgee is facing conflict resolution counselling following a series of complaints over his use of excessive force.
Queensland's Crime and Misconduct Commission made the recommendation last December in relation to Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley, after finding that conflicting evidence meant it could not charge him over allegations he deliberately drove over a Palm Island woman's foot, leaving her in agony.
Sergeant Hurley, who is now serving on the Gold Coast, has yet to undergo the counselling.
Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson said last night he was awaiting the outcome of other internal investigations over the death in custody.
In a damning finding, the CMC said Sergeant Hurley had failed to file the required traffic accident report, had attempted to influence the treating doctor and, later, misstated the medical findings over the woman's injuries in a police statement.
The woman, Barbara Pilot, was treated at the Palm Island hospital, where doctors reported a bone was protruding through her skin, although there was no fracture.
Ms Pilot told CMC investigators that Sergeant Hurley had reversed his police van over her foot when she tried to talk with him after he arrested her partner over a domestic incident.
She claimed Sergeant Hurley drove off without helping her.
Another Palm Island policeman, Detective Sergeant Darren Robinson, is facing disciplinary action after he admitted to failing to interview witnesses, including the treating doctor.
According to the report, obtained by the ABC's Lateline program that aired last night, the CMC said that although it could not recommend charges against Sergeant Hurley, he should attend counselling because of the history of complaints against him.
"It is considered that there is insufficient evidence to establish any criminal offence or disciplinary breach against Hurley," the CMC said. "However, the number of similar complaints of excessive use of force (although unsubstantiated) that have been made against Hurley is of concern."
In December, the CMC recommended to the Queensland Police Service that Sergeant Hurley receive training and guidance relating to the proper use of force and in conflict resolution, as well as in "other matters".
In a statement, Mr Atkinson confirmed Sergeant Hurley had yet to undergo the counselling because of outstanding investigations relating to the 2004 death in custody and the ensuing riot.
"We are hoping to deal with all the matters relating to Sergeant Hurley in one go," Mr Atkinson said through a spokeswoman.
Aboriginal leaders are waiting for an ethical standards probe into the handling of the death-in-custody investigation.
Palm investigation
Darren Robinson faces discipline over Mulrunji death-in-custody inquiry
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24597935-5006786,00.html
By Peter Michael | November 04, 2008
A TOP detective honoured with the highest police award for his bravery in the 2004 Palm Island riot is on extended leave ahead of the findings of a stalled four-year official misconduct probe.
Det-Sgt Darren Robinson is facing disciplinary action, and possibly criminal charges, over his handling of the initial Mulrunji death-in-custody inquiry under a long-running investigation headed by the Crime and Misconduct Commission.
Det-Sgt Robinson yesterday was one of three senior officers honoured in Townsville with the Queensland Police Valour Award, the top police bravery medal, for "acts of exceptional bravery in hazardous circumstances".
Sen-Sgt Raymond Kitching, a lead investigator in the initial Mulrunji inquiry who is also before the CMC, was recognised with a Commissioner's Award for Meritorious Service.
Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson told The Courier-Mail that the awards did not prejudge the stalled internal police inquiry.
"They are two separate issues," Mr Atkinson said.
Both officers shared beers and dinner with Senior-Sergeant Chris Hurley, who later was acquitted of Mulrunji's manslaughter, and held off-the-record conversations in an initial investigation slammed by the acting coroner as lacking transparency and independence.
Protesters did not disrupt the ceremony at which 34 officers were given awards.
They included 12 officers who were not on the island at the time of the riots but who manned the mainland communication centre and major incident room.
Palm Island's 4000 residents rioted and burnt down the police station and courthouse on November 26, 2004, shortly after the death in custody of Mulrunji Doomadgee.
Inspector Brian Richardson, who also was recognised with the highest police bravery medal, said the 19 officers besieged by the enraged mob still bore the mental scars.
"It's just something that sticks with you. The total breakdown of law and order, it's a terrible thing. It's a very lonely experience when you are trapped on an island and you have nowhere to go."
Sen-Sgt David Dini, a veteran indigenous police officer who was on the island, said it was "our finest hour".
Palm Is police awards anger critics - ABC Lateline
Palm Is police awards anger critics
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 03/11/2008
Reporter: Conor Duffy
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2409246.htm
Lawyer arrested and stripped by police
ABC Stateline Qld
Transcript
Watch-House Complaint
Broadcast: 16/10/2008
Reporter: JOHN TAYLOR
http://www.abc.net.au/stateline/qld/content/2006/s2393392.htm
JOHN TAYLOR: A lawyer who was taken into custody for failing to follow police instructions, and was stripped of her clothes and charged at the Brisbane watch-house says the situation must never happen again. The charge that saw her taken to the watch house was thrown out of court. But the Magistrate expressed profound shock at the way the woman was treated by police. The Police Service has not taken any action against the officers involved and the Crime and Misconduct Commission has been investigating for about five months.
EMMA MEADTH, COMPLAINANT: I'll never forget the horror I felt when I was on a cold hard concrete floor naked in Brisbane City Watch house. That's not something you forget in a hurry.
ANDREW BALE, SOLICITOR: It was probably not a revenge issue but it was an attempt to shut her up and make her leave them alone.
EMMA MEADTH: I'm a solicitor, who works in Brisbane; I do a lot of family law.
JOHN TAYLOR: Thirty two year old lawyer Emma Meadth knows more of the justice system than she wants. In November last year, she was in the heart of Brisbane drinking with a friend. There was a dispute over seating, the police were called, and Ms Meadth was arrested.
ANDREW BALE: The police charged her with contravening a direction, and the direction that she was issued was that she move on.
JOHN TAYLOR: She was taken to the Brisbane city watch-house. The watch-house internal cameras recorded what happened, and Ms Meadth got a copy through freedom of information. It shows her being forcibly stripped by two officers in a practice called "smocking".
EMMA MEADTH: I absolutely believe it was punishment. Yes. Yes.
JOHN TAYLOR: In May this year in the Brisbane's magistrate court Ms Meadth contested her charge of failing to move on. She won.
ANDREW BALE: Ultimately it was dismissed by the Magistrate effectively on the basis that she could not be satisfied the direction was even given. So that in fact she was arrested for an offence that was not made out because there was no direction.
JOHN TAYLOR: But what happened in the watch-house that night in November troubled Magistrate Linda Bradford-Morgan.
GRAPHIC (MAGISTRATE LINDA BRADFORD-MORGAN) 13th May 2008
I should record my profound shock at the contents of the CD which depicted the stripping, not smocking, the stripping of Ms Meadth who was conveyed to the watch-house. She said.
JOHN TAYLOR: She went on to say that Ms Meadth appeared to have been stripped because she told police she was a lawyer and knew her rights.
GRAPHIC (MAGISTRATE LINDA BRADFORD-MORGAN) 13th May 2008
This appears to have antagonised the watch-house personnel and what followed thereafter should properly be referred to the CMC. It being Queensland's powerful watchdog, the crime and misconduct commission.
JOHN TAYLOR: When Emma Meadth arrived at the Watch-house, she spent nearly an hour in a holding cell, where she repeatedly knocked on the door and pushed the buzzer. She was then taken to the charge counter, where after giving her basic details she refused to answer any other questions.
JOHN TAYLOR: In court defence Barrister Scott Lynch asked Constable Vicki Farley.
GRAPHIC (DEFENCE COUNSEL SCOTT LYNCH)
Do you recall the watch-house sergeant saying something of the like of "oh, you're one of those type, are you?
GRAPHIC (CONSTABLE VICKI FARLEY)
No, I don't recall, she said.
GRAPHIC (DEFENCE COUNSEL SCOTT LYNCH)
And directing that she be strip searched or stripped, not searched, just stripped?
GRAPHIC: (CONSTABLE VICKI FARLEY)
I don't think I was present. I don't recall any of that. She said.
JOHN TAYLOR: Were you being obstructive?
EMMA MEADTH: No I don't think so. I don't think so. I didn't do anything that I wouldn't advise a client to do in the same situation. And I thought that I had complied with all of my obligations as far as being arrested and being processed through the system.
JOHN TAYLOR: But minutes later she was restrained, and frogmarched to a padded cell where she was then stripped. According to court transcripts one of the officers involved, Constable Vicki Farley, told the Magistrates Court.
GRAPHIC (CONSTABLE VICKI FARLEY)
During, during the charging, a number of mental and physical health questions were asked of all defendants. The defendant refused to answer. As a result she was - its policy to place a defendant in a smock for if they refuse to answer, for their own safety. She said.
JOHN TAYLOR: But the court heard that "smocking" isn't in the police operations manual, and it was unknown who gave the order for it to be force upon Ms Meadth.
GRAPHIC (DEFENCE COUNSEL SCOTT LYNCH)
Defence Barrister Scott Lynch asked Constable Vicki Farley, who was in the cell when it happened. Where does this policy come about? Where did you read that? She replied I haven't read it anywhere.
ANDREW BALE, SOLICITOR: I've never heard of it before, I've never heard of it in general conversation, I've never heard of it as a policy, I'm never seen it anywhere in writing.
JOHN TAYLOR: Andrew Bale has been a Brisbane criminal lawyer for more than a decade, and represented Emma Meadth.
ANDREW BALE, SOLICITOR: The Queensland Police publish well an operational procedures manual. Now this policy of smocking certainly is not in the operational procedures manual so one wonders where it comes from, from a starting point. But that would be the appropriate place for something like that to be.
JOHN TAYLOR: If Ms Meadth was stripped for mental health reasons, those same reasons weren't enough for police to call for a doctor.
GRAPHIC (MAGISTRATE BRADFORD-MORGAN) 13th May 2008-10-17
Constable Farley asserted that Ms Meadth was stripped for her own safety but conceded that no-one had called a doctor arising out of any concerns for the wellbeing of the defendant she said and that some unknown police officer had directed that Ms Meadth be stripped.
ANDREW BALE, SOLICITOR: Look in this instance, no, Ms Meadth was in fact asking for a number of things, and she wasn't given any of them, but most importantly year she was asking for a medical practitioner to be called.
JOHN TAYLOR: Her requests for a solicitor were also ignored. After about an hour and 45 minutes in the smock, Ms Meadth was allowed to change back into her clothes as the process of releasing her began. What changed from the time that you were in the smock to the time that you were able to go back into your own clothes?
EMMA MEADTH: All I can figure is that they perhaps think they taught me the lesson that they wanted to teach me and they could get on with the processing. I've got no idea.
JOHN TAYLOR: Before her court victory, Ms Meadth wrote a letter to the Queensland Police Service complaining about her treatment.
EMMA MEADTH: I was interviewed via telephone for about 20 minutes from an officer whom I believe came from the same watch-house where this happened. And then got a letter not long afterwards saying they did not find my complaint to be justified.
GRAPHIC (P.J. BARRON ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER) 16th April 2008
There is significant video and documentary evidence which contradicts your allegations and indicates that you were obstructive and unco-operative towards police.
JOHN TAYLOR: But in court less than a month later, Magistrate Bradley-Morgan found.
GRAPHIC (MAGISTRATE LINDA BRADFORD-MORGAN) 13th May 2008
There was no contention that she behaved in an aggressive fashion, other than to state that she was a lawyer.
JOHN TAYLOR: After her court victory Ms Meadth went to the police watchdog the Crime and Misconduct Commission.
JOHN TAYLOR: It's been five months. What's happened?
EMMA MEADTH: Very little.
ANDREW BALE: What we know as lawyers is that evidence needs to be preserved and any investigation would need to look at evidence that may well have been destroyed by now.
JOHN TAYLOR: The CMC declined to be interviewed. So did the Queensland Police Service, because the CMC is investigating. It did release a statement saying that people may have their clothes and possessions taken from them and be provided a smock, if there was a concern they might injure themselves or others.
EMMA MEADTH: This is where I'm brought into the padded cell.
JOHN TAYLOR: Emma Meadth believes her case has raised many issues including the need for the policy of "smocking" to be seriously looked at. And while she continues to fight against what happened that night the memories are strong.
JOHN TAYLOR: How does it feel to see this?
EMMA MEADTH: It's horrifying. And I wonder how many times it's happened since this happened to me. It was the most frightened I've ever been in my whole life. There's just not much more I can say.
CMC Media Release buried by the silly season
This lady will get a tidy sum because the stripping was a consequence of her unlawful arrest.
CMC
23.12.2008
Police followed procedure in stripping solicitor
http://www.cmc.qld.gov.au/asp/index.asp?pgid=10814&cid=5201&id=1228
The CMC has found that police who stripped a woman in the Brisbane watchhouse and placed her in a smock last year acted lawfully and in accordance with established procedure.
Brisbane Solicitor, Emma Meadth, was arrested in the Queen Street Mall on 9 November 2007 after she failed to comply with a police direction to ‘move-on’.
The charge against her was dismissed in May this year, after a magistrate ruled that police had failed to give Meadth a reason for the direction.
The matter received media attention when the magistrate expressed shock at the fact Meadth had been forcibly stripped when taken to the Brisbane City watchhouse after her arrest.
However, CMC investigators have established that Ms Meadth failed to respond to mandatory questions about the state of her health, so police were obliged to treat her as being at risk of self-harm.
CMC Chairperson, Robert Needham, said Ms Meadth had her clothes removed and was placed in a tear-resistant smock after she failed to answer routine questions designed to test whether a prisoner is at risk of suicide or self-harm.
“The Operational Procedures Manual demands that police protect people who may be at risk, and the use of a tear-resistant smock is an appropriate response,” Mr Needham said.
“While her experience was undoubtedly harrowing, officers dealing with Ms Meadth were acting in line with procedural requirements which address duty of care concerns.
“These procedures have been developed with medical advice, and are in line with past coronial recommendations,” he said.
The CMC also concluded there was no evidence that Ms Meadth’s treatment was influenced by the fact she is a legal practitioner.
POLICE SPYING ON ACTIVISTS REVEALED
http://www.perth.indymedia.org/?action=newswire&parentview=133442